![]() |
![]() |
#1179 |
Nov 2016
22·3·5·47 Posts |
![]()
We can use the sense of http://www.iakovlev.org/zip/riesel2.pdf to conclude that (k*b^n+c)/gcd(k+c,b-1) (k>=1, b>=2, c != 0, gcd(k,c) = 1, gcd(b,c) = 1) eventually should yield a prime, when it does not have primes for small n>=1
We should find the n's such that (k*b^n+c)/gcd(k+c,b-1) does not have small prime factors (and the znorder of b mod its prime factors are also not small), nor has algebra factors (i.e. k*b^n and -c are both rth powers for some r>1, or k*b^n*c is of the form 4*m^4) Last fiddled with by sweety439 on 2020-12-23 at 21:52 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1180 |
Nov 2016
22×3×5×47 Posts |
![]()
Update pdf files for the Sierpinski/Riesel conjectures
Last fiddled with by sweety439 on 2021-02-15 at 16:00 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1181 |
Nov 2016
1011000001002 Posts |
![]()
Update newest status text file for R/S 40
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1182 |
Nov 2016
282010 Posts |
![]()
Riesel base 2021 is proven!!! With CK=13, see https://github.com/xayahrainie4793/E...0to%202048.txt
Code:
k,n 1,67 2,1048 3,1773 4,3 5,140 6,2 7,117 8,2 9,1 10,269 11,14 12,1 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1183 |
Mar 2006
Germany
2,879 Posts |
![]()
So you got your own definition of GCD?
In the first post reads (for Riesel side): (k*b^n-1)/gcd(k-1, b-1) b=2021, k=1, n=67 (from table above) GCD for k=1 in the above formula is undefined and so (1*2021^67-1)/2020 is prime but do not correlates to your definiton of the problem and the definition of GCD. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1184 | |
Nov 2016
B0416 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1185 |
Nov 2016
22·3·5·47 Posts |
![]()
Update the status of Riesel problems to include the new primes for R2 and new test limits for R2, R6 (k=1597), R108 (k = 5351, 6528, 13162)
Last fiddled with by sweety439 on 2021-02-24 at 18:31 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1186 |
Nov 2016
1011000001002 Posts |
![]()
Update the status of Sierpinski problems to include the new primes for S80 (all k except k=947), S81, S108 (k=20543) and the new test limits for S2, S80 (all k except k=947), S81, S97
Last fiddled with by sweety439 on 2021-02-24 at 18:32 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1187 |
Nov 2016
22·3·5·47 Posts |
![]()
Upload pdf files for these conjectures
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1188 | |
Nov 2016
B0416 Posts |
![]() Quote:
CK=3259 Only list k == 1 mod 7 and k == 1 mod 23 since other k are already in CRUS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The dual Sierpinski/Riesel problem | sweety439 | sweety439 | 14 | 2021-02-15 15:58 |
Semiprime and n-almost prime candidate for the k's with algebra for the Sierpinski/Riesel problem | sweety439 | sweety439 | 11 | 2020-09-23 01:42 |
The reverse Sierpinski/Riesel problem | sweety439 | sweety439 | 20 | 2020-07-03 17:22 |
Sierpinski/ Riesel bases 6 to 18 | robert44444uk | Conjectures 'R Us | 139 | 2007-12-17 05:17 |
Sierpinski/Riesel Base 10 | rogue | Conjectures 'R Us | 11 | 2007-12-17 05:08 |