20220601, 20:31  #254 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
13·853 Posts 
OK here is my "secret" (lol):
I was partially joking about the formulas, although not entirely. I do apply a score. The main key is that I take a snapshot of your sequences each day in the early afternoon. Then I know what has been added or changed. I then do an (almost) full ECM/factorization (to 30% or t35, whichever is smaller) on all of the ones that have been updated until they hit a "hard" cofactor > C110. I then have a spreadsheet that applies the following score to all of the sequences looking for the lowest lying fruit: size + 2 * cofactor length  log (smallest factor) + if smallest factor = 3, +5, else 0. Of course lower score is better. I found that the smallest factor of 3 is hard to break hence the penalty. Smallest factors of 5, 7, 11 don't seem so tough so no adjustment. This is kind of interesting when there is no factor known. For instance on 60^86 that is a 137/137, as per above I ECM'd it to t35. So I just use 1e35 for the smallest factor size. The doubling of the 137 cofactor length makes it mostly untenable scorewise for me even with the reduction of 35 from the log of the smallest factor. This only works if you've mostly fully ECM'd the latest iteration on all of the sequences. Otherwise the ones that have not been ECM'd will appear tougher than they really are. This score is kind of a "difficulty rating" for terminating a sequence. It can probably be improved upon. I have already done a few changes to it. The most recent addition was to add 5 when the lowest factor was 3. That seemed to help quite a bit. I kept getting stuck on tough ones where the factor of 3 would not go away. So...I just run the ones that have been updated and sometimes that alone with terminate them. With what is left I work topdown from lowest score. It is an iterative process. Many times I'll take one with lowest score and it will hit a larger hard cofactor. If the hard cofactor becomes > C120 I usually stop it because the score has become much greater. I'll then move on to the one with the now lowest score. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20220601 at 21:25 
20220601, 21:27  #255 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
13×853 Posts 
95^77 terminates

20220602, 07:03  #256 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
13·853 Posts 
85^79 terminates
This was a slog. It quickly dropped into the low 120's making it look like a quick one. It then picked up the factor 3, which remained for ~50 iterations from size 122 to 106. Finally the 3 dropped and it terminated quickly after that. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20220602 at 07:28 
20220602, 12:29  #257 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
4,691 Posts 
I have a few different things I do to choose which sequences to bring down, as well. I look for those that have no small factors because those will likely fall several digits. And, I look for those bases with one or two sequences left. While the list is lengthy, I will toss in some larger composites or work those last holdouts.And, I have a smaller GPU that I will set up with a second machine (for stage 2 residues) to run through a set of sequences looking for ECM hits, similar to what you're doing,
I'm afraid this thread may have lost some interest since I moved to a threshold of 145 digits, But, there are still many smaller sequences left, so maybe it's due to summer approaching. 
20220602, 12:31  #258 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2B51_{16} Posts 
113^71 terminates

20220602, 19:55  #259 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
13×853 Posts 
151^61 and 1250^42 terminate

20220603, 00:51  #260 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
25521_{8} Posts 
1152^48 terminates

20220603, 03:33  #261 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
1551_{10} Posts 
Taking 57^85

20220603, 04:26  #262 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
13·853 Posts 
131^71 terminates

20220603, 14:54  #263 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
3·11·47 Posts 
57^85 terminated by me.
Taking 6^200 
20220603, 15:05  #264 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
3×11×47 Posts 
Well, that was quick: 6^200 terminated by me.
Taking 53^99 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Unexpected termination of PM1  Miszka  Software  22  20211119 21:36 
Easier pi(x) approximation  mathPuzzles  Math  8  20170504 10:58 
Would finding a definate Pi value easier if...  xtreme2k  Math  34  20130909 23:54 
Aliquot Termination Question  Largest Prime?  EdH  Aliquot Sequences  6  20100406 00:12 
A new termination below 100k  10metreh  Aliquot Sequences  0  20100311 18:24 