![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Mar 2004
Belgium
839 Posts |
![]()
Update: k=3250995 is tested from 10K to 96300.
26 primes found ![]() Sieved until 125G Gonna take this K up to ??? Regards, Cedric ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Mar 2004
Belgium
839 Posts |
![]()
Tested 3250995 to 114832 (from 10k)
If anyone is interested in tha results, pm me for my mail adress. Regards, C. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Jun 2004
10610 Posts |
![]()
k=226005 has been sieved for 217000<n<300000 at 445bn with 11200 tests left. It has been tested from 203000<n<217000 and no primes found.
k=226005 has been sieved for 1<n<203000 at 100 bn with 20000 tests left. It has been tested from 1<n<63000 and 89 primes found! I am currently testing it for 217000<n<300000. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Jun 2004
2×3×7 Posts |
![]()
Reserving 4471935
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Mar 2004
Belgium
15078 Posts |
![]()
k= 234686595 CedricVonck [Reserved]
Gonna take this k from n = 10k to ? Please un-reserve my previous K Grtz C. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Sep 2005
Raleigh, North Carolina
337 Posts |
![]()
I am quitting K=850612425, tested from 10k to 275965k with only 100 primes 2 of which were reportable.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
Mar 2004
Belgium
839 Posts |
![]()
Will also take k=360949875
C. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Jun 2004
11010102 Posts |
![]()
Taking also k=1386560175 and I release k=226005
Anyone who wants the sievefile (until 450bn) can PM me |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Nov 2003
2·1,811 Posts |
![]()
A file with k=1785 values in the 361-400k range sieved to 386bn was kindly provided by Flatlander. The file was checked by Battlemaxx (L148) and John (L140) but they found no primes although 1785 looked promising since Flatlander found 7 primes in the 200-361k range.
Last fiddled with by Kosmaj on 2006-01-17 at 19:06 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Sep 2005
Raleigh, North Carolina
337 Posts |
![]()
I suffered a setback, I just bought a new box and 3 weeks later the hard drive crashed, its going to be replaced by dell, but for my k=1222853775, I lost all testing and sieve file from n=10k to 250k, I think my testing was at approx. 176K. My second box is still testing 250k to 300k.
Should I sieve & test from my last prime or start at 175k. All of the llrresults are gone also. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Nov 2003
362210 Posts |
![]()
Sorry to hear that
![]() ![]() ![]() You can continue from k you think was checked most recently, 176k in your case. We don't collect result files from "choose your own k", so no problems there. And finally congrats on your latest prime, from the same k ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best Work for Finding Primes | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 9 | 2012-06-24 13:50 |
Which settings to choose for best work? | jmb1982 | Software | 2 | 2009-04-07 09:33 |
Help test 210885 - Find a new top 5000 prime! | SlashDude | Riesel Prime Search | 121 | 2008-01-03 08:47 |
Help test 2995125705 - Find a new top 5000 prime! | SlashDude | Riesel Prime Search | 538 | 2007-05-08 01:42 |
The fastest way to a top-5000 prime? | lsoule | 15k Search | 13 | 2005-09-19 20:24 |