20201125, 19:40  #144  
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2·3^{2}·7·73 Posts 
Quote:


20201125, 20:07  #145 
Jul 2003
wear a mask
1524_{10} Posts 
I know. I think sweety439 should amend their guess to something like:
135029747  Christmas Day, 2024 That guess would land right in a huge (but realistic!) open patch on your graph. ...AND 135029747 is13D0D13D in base 14! Isn't that awesome? Last fiddled with by masser on 20201125 at 21:04 Reason: If wrong about the gender, they can correct me. A less egregiou mistake than editing someone else's words without permission 
20201126, 16:12  #146  
Jan 2020
157_{10} Posts 
Quote:
sweety439 could have guessed 130,629,749 or 130,299,749 or 130,297,949 > those numbers may have higher chances for the factors to show up between 2^73 to 2^77 when being trialed as there aren't very many other neighbor primes. The number M103,305,173 I've passed on to Kriesel which he's currently performing the PRP tests still have many other unfactored lookalikes: M103,305,133, M103,307,153, M103,307,173, M103,308,173, M103,505,173 Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 20201126 at 16:49 

20201127, 16:27  #147 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
3·5·17·19 Posts 
verified composite (Cert by Ben Delo). The other recently posted M52 predictions have also been primality tested (but not the suggestions for Sweety439's future choices), except for 103037743 which will complete in a few days.
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20201127 at 16:56 
20201202, 22:54  #148 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2·3^{2}·7·73 Posts 

20201203, 12:41  #149 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
11355_{8} Posts 
These were originally done on gpuowl v7.11 and v7.111 on a system with nonECC ram.
"Please upgrade to v7.2 which fixes a proof generation bug." https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...&postcount=154 Sometime soon, will update additional workers to gpuowl v7.221. I don't think PrimeNet will accept a fixed proof submission from the original runs, and it's moot because the inputs were not saved. (Too bad, because they take about a day to PRP and minutes to verify on radeon vii.) I didn't think I needed to save them, because these were selfverified at the ends of the runs: Code:
20201126 01:10:15 asr2/radeonvii3 102685769 proof verification: doing 200559 iterations ... 20201126 01:13:08 asr2/radeonvii3 102685769 proof: 102685769 proved composite 20201126 01:13:08 asr2/radeonvii3 102685769 Proof selfverification OK 20201126 01:13:08 asr2/radeonvii3 102685769 Proof 'proof\1026857699.proof' generated 20201126 11:52:08 asr2/radeonvii2 102685711 proof verification: doing 200559 iterations ... 20201126 11:55:04 asr2/radeonvii2 102685711 proof: 102685711 proved composite 20201126 11:55:04 asr2/radeonvii2 102685711 Proof selfverification OK 20201126 11:55:04 asr2/radeonvii2 102685711 Proof 'proof\1026857119.proof' generated Thought I was being conservative by selfverifying, and ironically, that is what triggers the proof error. https://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=26152 So falling back to traditional DC approach: 102685769 was already queued in prime95 v30.3b6 on a dualxeon workstation with ECC ram and current ETA is Dec 26. 102685711 was already queued in prime95 v30.3b6 on a somewhat faster dualxeon workstation with ECC ram and current ETA is Dec 22. Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20201203 at 12:42 
20201205, 17:22  #150 
Jan 2020
157 Posts 
Looks like the exponents from 102 to 103 millions just opened to everyone today. Can someone other than Kriesel reserve and start to test 102,374,113?
Especially when a specific exponent looks similar to the ones I've guessed, I want to see the results of it faster. Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 20201205 at 17:24 
20201205, 17:27  #151 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2×3^{2}×7×73 Posts 
Test your own number. This is not the thread to solicit help in testing your guesses. If you really think it is prime, test it yourself to get the prize. Put your hardware where your mouth is.

20201205, 17:33  #152 
Jan 2020
157 Posts 
The exponent which I ran the LL test during Oct 2020, I tried the PRP on it too, looked like everything went okay.
https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...exp_hi=&full=1 
20201205, 17:52  #153  
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
3·5·17·19 Posts 
Quote:
Not fast enough? Get a used radeon vii gpu, which can test 1 in about a day, for ~$800. Or both, or more, with correspondingly higher cost. But patience is less costly. All we have to do is fit the assignment rules. https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/ Within that, I run the mix I choose to run. I think it's peculiar that you seem to mistakenly believe you have a right to tell others what they can or can not test. Perhaps I misunderstood. Patience and commitment are powerful. 

20201205, 18:01  #154 
Jan 2020
157 Posts 
I could finish a PRP test with the result certified, but wasn't able to reserve it when I started on that one, the server required me to finish up 5 PRPs prior to it.
The server even showed my result was reliable before the final certification from another user. 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Predict M50  Uncwilly  Lounge  65  20180106 17:11 
Predict M#50...  Raman  Lounge  3  20161003 19:23 
Predict M44...  Xyzzy  Lounge  66  20140201 14:45 
Predict M45...  ewmayer  Lounge  215  20080917 21:14 
Predict M42  Uncwilly  Lounge  22  20050227 02:11 