mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > And now for something completely different

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-11-12, 21:13   #12
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

47×197 Posts
Lightbulb

I submit that k*p#/2+d (where d=+-2,+-4,+-8) has a benefit of leaving relatively dense set of odd k values, so one can sieve deeper than for other forms, with end result of finding quint faster (wall clock time).
I usually sieve for 6-plet, test central quad and have double chance to hit the quint (+8 or -8; ...and who knows, lottery is cruel -- maybe even both). I do these fishing expeditions once every few years.
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-11-13, 11:24   #13
Puzzle-Peter
 
Puzzle-Peter's Avatar
 
Jun 2009

67710 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
(+8 or -8; ...and who knows, lottery is cruel -- maybe even both).

Oh the cruelty!


When sieving for a 6tuplet, you eliminate a lot of possible 5tuplets because +8 or -8 gets sieved out. So you probably will have to use a larger candidate range. Does it really pay off regarding wallclock time? Not counting the possibility of a cruel event of course.
Puzzle-Peter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-11-13, 20:34   #14
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

47×197 Posts
Default

Yes
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


All times are UTC. The time now is 09:20.

Tue Jan 19 09:20:59 UTC 2021 up 47 days, 5:32, 0 users, load averages: 2.75, 2.60, 2.43

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.