![]() |
![]() |
#45 | |
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2·3·13·83 Posts |
![]() Quote:
time LL train? I've already tried in vain. David Last fiddled with by davieddy on 2011-11-10 at 08:12 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 | |
"Ethan O'Connor"
Oct 2002
GIMPS since Jan 1996
2×72 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I agree completely. That's why I've put so much GPU time into LL the front in GPU to 72. But to put this in perspective, when I started with GIMPS the LL front was in exponents about 10x those at the DC tail. The ratio of the LL front to the DC tail is now closer to 2.5 to 1, and I would like it to stay there or better. For me, a lot of the aesthetic value of this project lies not only in answering questions of mind boggling complexity, but in striving to answer them correctly, with reliable confidence levels. In many ways I'd be more excited if a prime popped up in the DCs than if we were to find a new record prime. I want to measure and monitor the error rate over time, with as little latency as possible. And I want to see the DC tail move up as rapidly as possible. I'll be splitting my time between the two whether or not there's automation enabling the DC factoring work, but if it was made available I'd take advantage of it with a lot of appreciation :) ethan Last fiddled with by Ethan (EO) on 2011-11-10 at 07:59 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Jul 2003
So Cal
23·52·13 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 | ||
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
3×5×739 Posts |
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Therefore, I will be providing a DC TF worktype in the near future. Each worker will be able to request whatever worktype they want -- the system will not decide for them. Edit: I forgot to mention -- the system now has a formal P-1 work type which petrw1 and a few others are using. It's available as a sub-menu on the "Get Assignments" menu. And to put davieddy's mind at ease, his assignment was changed to be a P-1 type -- he'll not be doing any CPU TF work on it. Last fiddled with by chalsall on 2011-11-10 at 14:18 |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
3·1,759 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3×29×83 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 | |
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2·3·13·83 Posts |
![]() Quote:
David |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Oct 2011
Maryland
12216 Posts |
![]()
It looks like you might not be picking up when P-1s are finishing. I finished M47895521 a while ago, and it isn't showing up on the website.
It also took it to lower bounds than I would have liked. B2 was under 10M, when I am actually around 20M a lot. Is this because of the higher than usual TF? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | ||
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
3·1,759 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Oct 2011
Maryland
2·5·29 Posts |
![]()
Also, I wonder when more are going to be available. Is it just as exponents are TF'ed to 72, or is there a manual step in there?
I get nervous when I have under a couple day's worth queued up. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 | |
"Ethan O'Connor"
Oct 2002
GIMPS since Jan 1996
2·72 Posts |
![]() Quote:
They run $199 to $279 though -- so it's sort of on the bubble in terms of value vs. an inexpensive new system. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 5 | 2016-10-22 01:55 |
Aouessare-El Haddouchi-Essaaidi "test": "if Mp has no factor, it is prime!" | wildrabbitt | Miscellaneous Math | 11 | 2015-03-06 08:17 |
Collaborative mathematics: the "polymath" project | Dougy | Math | 11 | 2009-10-21 10:04 |
Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier? | nitai1999 | Software | 7 | 2004-08-26 18:12 |