![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
106178 Posts |
![]()
Okay we have the new LLRs from Jean and George and we will reach n=2 million all the sooner... but then what? I have started to sieve 2-7million not with aim of completely doing it but with that of have something to LLR after 2 million. Thomas Ritschel took 1.7 Ghz year to sieve 1-2m... so with new LLR's 2-3m would take 6-7 GHz years to sieve. To get 2-7 million to that level is going to take 20+GHz years. I have only 4 GHz of sieving computers at the moment. It would take me 5 years by myself but it should be available with in a year? So is there enough good will out there to DC the sieving? Or should I restrict myself to 2-3m and then take it from there?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
3×1,619 Posts |
![]() Quote:
![]() I'm devoted to this project, just choose what work best fits to me ![]() Luigi |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
5×29×31 Posts |
![]()
Your P4 is best suited to LLR work.
I have decided to sieve only 2-3 million. Anybody wanting to help out please email me. You will probably have an Athlon/PIII and be prepared to run it for a few months. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Feb 2003
27·3·5 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Since even with the new (faster) LLR the n=1-2M range wouldn't be completed in relativelly short time, there is plenty of time (well, about one year, or so) to do some extended sieving. Therefore we shouldn't concentrate on 2-3M only but do an even larger range, e.g. the 2-7M you mentioned, Paul. Even in case that we run short of time (or data blocks for LLR), we could split of the 2-3M range from the presieved 2-7M and do the remaining 3-7M later. But besides all the euphorics about the new LLR we shouldn't forget that the sieving is only about 5% of the whole work. Currently we are only 5 or 6 active members (LLRlers) with 12 or 15 machines. To reach a million digits (not "binary" digits) prime, it will take us a few years. Hopefully the new LLR with it's working stop/restart behaviour will attract some more coworkers. -- Thomas ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Feb 2003
27·3·5 Posts |
![]() Quote:
So go and grab a new range, Luigi! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
106178 Posts |
![]()
Well, I have started sieving n=2-3 million with the view of doing any sieving for higher values when we are LLR'ing 2-3m. I have created 20 10trillion blocks which is more than plenty. After the first 38.5 trillion has been done we can incorporate the tail end of n=1-2 million. This will be enough work for a year. 3+million can be started in a year's time -- this will keep us buzy for years...
Thomas email me letting me know how many machines you have free. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Jan 2004
Kansas City, Missouri
2×5 Posts |
![]()
I could put my old Celeron 700 MhZ to work on sieving, don't know how much help it would be because it would do it part time on that machine.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
449510 Posts |
![]()
Probabaly not much help if it's part-time. How many hours per week is it on? Also the the Windoze version of NewPGen has to be modified to make it suitably automatic -- I am waiting for Paul Jobling to "fix" it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Jan 2004
Kansas City, Missouri
2·5 Posts |
![]()
It's on from atleast 8:00 Am - 9:00 PM, It doesn't run during the night.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
5×29×31 Posts |
![]()
Okay. When Paul Jobling has modified NewPGen I will contact you. Your range will have to be, I suppose, no more that 5 trillion...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Jan 2004
Kansas City, Missouri
128 Posts |
![]()
k, sounds good.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NFS sieving? | Dubslow | Factoring | 8 | 2012-09-28 06:47 |
Line sieving vs. lattice sieving | JHansen | NFSNET Discussion | 9 | 2010-06-09 19:25 |
10^420 + 1 sieving | juno1369 | Factoring | 20 | 2010-04-28 01:11 |
Sieving | OmbooHankvald | Prime Sierpinski Project | 4 | 2005-06-30 07:51 |
Sieving | robert44444uk | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 8 | 2005-04-02 22:30 |