20040715, 16:26  #1 
May 2004
Italy
1010_{2} Posts 
P90 CPU years credits
I noticed that the credits for trial factoring are not homogeneus with the ones for P1 factoring; it looks like trial factoring credits maybe fifty times more than P1 factoring. Is that correct, and if yes, why?
I noticed also that in one case prime95 tried to start a LL test with a 1024k FFT, but then stopped because of rounding errors and restarted with a 1280k FFT (The exponent was 20256751). When the test ended, the credit was something more that two P90 CPU years, which means that the calculation was based on 1024k FFT timings, and not on 1280k FFT. The test ran on a CPU with SSE2; a CPU without SSE2 would have used a 1024k FFT without problems. 
20040718, 09:48  #2 
"Patrik Johansson"
Aug 2002
Uppsala, Sweden
5^{2}·17 Posts 
I think that a P1 always gives 0.001 years if you don't find a factor.
Also, AFAIK the LL credits are based on the default nonSSE2 FFT limits. The benchmark page shows these FFT crossover limits. They may be adjusted by the program after 1000 test iterations (see "New features in Version 22.8 of prime95.exe" in whatsnew.txt). So the largest exponents currently handed out by the server lie in the range 24.93M25.35M where SSE2 computers get less credit than what is motivated by the effort. 
20040718, 14:14  #3  
Sep 2003
Borg HQ, Delta Quadrant
2·3^{3}·13 Posts 
Quote:


Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Assignment credits?  afjewkes  PrimeNet  2  20160715 06:26 
Question about credits  MooMoo2  Twin Prime Search  9  20110615 08:38 
CREDITS GONE  pegaso56  Information & Answers  2  20091215 02:55 
How to create TWO fat CPU credits?  ET_  PrimeNet  12  20081103 22:11 
V5 credits for trialfactoring  Graff  PrimeNet  2  20080725 15:21 