mersenneforum.org gpuOwL: an OpenCL program for Mersenne primality testing
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2020-09-25, 22:07   #2487
kriesel

"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

41·113 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Xyzzy Somehow we got gpuowl to work on our integrated graphics. (It runs so slow that it isn't worth doing, but it is neat that it works at all!) Code: 2020-09-25 13:26:07 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630-1 OpenCL compilation in 6.71 s 2020-09-25 13:26:21 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630-1 77936867 OK 0 loaded: blockSize 400, 0000000000000003 2020-09-25 13:26:56 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630-1 77936867 OK 800 0.00%; 29530 us/it; ETA 26d 15:17; 1579c241dc63eca6 (check 11.88s) 2020-09-25 15:07:23 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630-1 77936867 OK 200000 0.26%; 30198 us/it; ETA 27d 04:05; f0b04b45b0855bd2 (check 11.97s)
Yes. HD630<UHD630. Your posted timings extrapolate to 6-7 weeks for one PRP of a wavefront exponent. And it would contend for the TDP and memory bandwidth available for mprime etc on the cpu. Which version gpuowl was it?

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-spec...hics-630.c2962
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compar...56797vsm178724

2020-09-25, 22:28   #2488
moebius

Jul 2009
Germany

22·32·11 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Xyzzy Somehow we got gpuowl to work on our integrated graphics. (It runs so slow 2020-09-25 15:07:23 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630-1 77936867 OK 200000 0.26%; 30198 us/it; ETA 27d 04:05; f0b04b45b0855bd2 (check 11.97s)
Without wanting to offend you, don't do it, it's an excessive waste of electricity.

2020-09-26, 00:38   #2489
Xyzzy

"Mike"
Aug 2002

22×41×47 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kriesel Yes. HD630
We were not using the integrated graphics for the display so maybe that contributed to it working.
Quote:
 Originally Posted by kriesel Which version gpuowl was it?
6.11
Quote:
 Originally Posted by moebius Without wanting to offend you, don't do it, it's an excessive waste of electricity.

2020-09-26, 03:46   #2490
preda

"Mihai Preda"
Apr 2015

1,301 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Neutron3529 Is it possible to test SP in gpuowl now? I will soon bought nvidia RTX 3090 and want to test whether 3090 generate good results I want to test dp,sp and int32(maybe using M31), is it possible using gpuowl to perform such test? anyway, thanks for your great program!
For a developer wanting to explore, those past experiments are available in git history; but they're not active now.

I'm planning to implement a double-SP in gpuowl next (1 month timeframe).

2020-09-26, 04:40   #2491
Neutron3529

Dec 2018
China

23×5 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by preda For a developer wanting to explore, those past experiments are available in git history; but they're not active now. I'm planning to implement a double-SP in gpuowl next (1 month timeframe).

...

I'll wait both your implementation and the water-cooling version of RTX 3090.
(A sad thing... maybe you'll be faster than RTX3090 )

2020-09-26, 15:19   #2492
kriesel

"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

121916 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Neutron3529 Is it possible to test SP in gpuowl now? I will soon bought nvidia RTX 3090 and want to test whether 3090 generate good results I want to test dp,sp and int32(maybe using M31), is it possible using gpuowl to perform such test?
V1.9 & 1.10 implemented DP, SP, M31, and M61. It's unlikely to run on NVIDIA though. FFT lengths supported then were 2M, 4M, 8M only IIRC.
https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...39&postcount=4

2020-09-26, 16:47   #2493
storm5510
Random Account

Aug 2009
U.S.A.

31268 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kriesel V1.9 & 1.10 implemented DP, SP, M31, and M61. It's unlikely to run on NVIDIA though. FFT lengths supported then were 2M, 4M, 8M only IIRC.
I want to get this straight. I have looked at the last several postings above. They read like features will be added which will not function on Nvidia GPU's, making it unusable. Is this correct?

2020-09-26, 17:40   #2494
VBCurtis

"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

33·163 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by storm5510 I want to get this straight. I have looked at the last several postings above. They read like features will be added which will not function on Nvidia GPU's, making it unusable. Is this correct?
Do you understand how version numbers work? If you do, you can figure out whether 1.9 and 1.10 are in the future or the past. I say this since the context of the posts escapes you entirely.

2020-09-26, 18:58   #2495
kriesel

"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

121916 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kriesel V1.9 & 1.10 implemented DP, SP, M31, and M61. It's unlikely to run on NVIDIA though. FFT lengths supported then were 2M, 4M, 8M only IIRC. https://github.com/preda/gpuowl/blob/NTT/README.md https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...39&postcount=4
Code:
Nov 2017 V1.9 binaries for Windows http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpos...&postcount=226
Jan 2018 V1.9 binaries updated for Windows http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpos...&postcount=272
Preda develops gpuowl on AMD gpus, linux, and its rocm driver. He has been generous enough to support Windows also from the very beginning, and with a little help from others has also since V6.5 (May 2019) supported NVIDIA gpus somewhat. Any support in gpuowl of Intel IGPs or AMD IGPUs etc is probably a lucky coincidence. V6.11 has had an amazingly long run, with at least 380 commits apparently. (I wonder which of those XYZZY referred to above.) Preda's now planning what gpuowl V7.x will or won't offer. Hopefully it will continue the NVIDIA support.

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-09-26 at 19:01

2020-09-26, 22:27   #2496
preda

"Mihai Preda"
Apr 2015

24258 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kriesel Hopefully it will continue the NVIDIA support.
Yes, I'm as excited as anybody about the new shiny hardware coming out.

I also like AMD's open philosophy (open source), and unfortunately Nvidia doesn't share in that. That's the historical reason why I don't own any Nvidia GPU ATM.

OTOH AMD has been underwhelming on the GPU front since the great Radeon VII. Simply no worthy AMD GPU available now. (and that's without saying anything about the software side, the ROCm development..)

So, if Nvidia builds good hardware, we should put it to good use if possible. I plan to explore a bit SP, which if successful would benefit Nvidia HW most.

2020-09-27, 00:34   #2497
storm5510
Random Account

Aug 2009
U.S.A.

2·811 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by VBCurtis Do you understand how version numbers work? If you do, you can figure out whether 1.9 and 1.10 are in the future or the past. I say this since the context of the posts escapes you entirely.
I should know how version numbers work. I've at this since 1988. The gpuOwl version I am running now is 6.11.380. Before was 6.11.340. I do not understand how 1.9 and 1.10 fit into this scenario, unless they go way back in time and were early releases.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Bdot GPU Computing 1657 2020-10-27 01:23 xx005fs GpuOwl 0 2019-07-26 21:37 1260 Software 17 2015-08-28 01:35 CRGreathouse Computer Science & Computational Number Theory 18 2013-06-08 19:12 Unregistered Information & Answers 4 2006-10-04 22:38

All times are UTC. The time now is 11:36.

Thu Oct 29 11:36:10 UTC 2020 up 49 days, 8:47, 1 user, load averages: 1.03, 1.76, 1.94