20200709, 15:34  #1563 
Random Account
Aug 2009
U.S.A.
11×139 Posts 
UID: storm5510/7700_Kaby_Lake, M7755521 has a factor: 105137409539055148931876353 (P1, B1=370000, B2=8140000, E=6)
86.442 bits. This is not a record here, or for me. However, it is the first I have found of any significance is a really long time. 
20200711, 03:57  #1564 
Sep 2002
2×5×7×11 Posts 
P1 found a factor in stage #2, B1=760000, B2=13680000.
UID: Jwb52z/Clay, M99633031 has a factor: 97905827678596252126675363231 (P1, B1=760000, B2=13680000), 96.305 bits. 
20200712, 12:56  #1565 
Random Account
Aug 2009
U.S.A.
11·139 Posts 
From gpuOwl:
{"status":"F", "exponent":"7765781", "...":"PM1", "B1":"370000", "B2":"8140000", "...", "factors":["140468706376328182650630225863",...} 96.826 bits. {"status":"F", "exponent":"7766881", "...":"PM1", "B1":"370000", "B2":"8140000", "...", "factors":["14786058658810602089190892018393"...} 103.544 bits. I shortened these a little for readability. 
20200720, 21:41  #1566 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
5·1,723 Posts 
332283361 Factored
297034017173995954820063 77 bits The exponent has previously had a total about 60% of a first time check run (3 different users). What a waste of cycles when a factor was so close. I have done 7 different single bit factoring runs on this exponent (2009, 2012, 2014, 2014, 2015, 2017, 2020) 
20200721, 08:30  #1567 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
307_{10} Posts 
If the exponent would have received proper P1'ing with stage 2, the same factor would long have been found, even barely with the lower GPU72 bounds.

20200721, 17:47  #1568  
Random Account
Aug 2009
U.S.A.
11×139 Posts 
Some I have found in recent days:
Quote:


20200721, 18:41  #1569  
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
exNorthern Ontario
7×433 Posts 
Does this make it simpler? Now with sortable columns for exponent/bits/date.
https://www.mersenne.ca/pm1user/63934/date You can copypaste with BBcode already provided: Quote:


20200722, 03:52  #1570 
Jul 2003
wear a mask
1,433 Posts 
That's snazzy!

20200722, 04:30  #1571 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
5×1,723 Posts 
3307 has (another factor) 3413215452475967590824666626325289455333796024133147903 181.1 bits Found on The kicker is that the remaining cofactor is...... a PRP prime. Here it is in all of its 895 digits of glory Code:
4353524133827611408574208775478589622111831317341613312984483361937010301205675662770047321087657048773241272664969392649718635926074520045281026910770712314524181933285227032125890659729016386069176693616914507334697422980860732777622339397522425721336605336658097363439448188753603624197638404803872825913098432275237874692169933508441748813480413682045289248409103532867732796807798694178375216208599640289769681995273685523060799468166287838493578146083048523489321729004640944722830982540726315520246334782951056660779801812979132998107387817802450037638989678012221564659671646755919013676548232993387587588481088712201127163199334146273445861473198777280904858096693010663932570520300269384917851688798854877340668001753453962945664051594771519075317923436346650061743281400127677733596528217642970792987250908618113230982353461817488308071861173968794875263418257665630917664743895435713 Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 20200722 at 13:57 Reason: Error correction 
20200722, 08:40  #1572 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
133_{16} Posts 

20200722, 13:49  #1573  
Random Account
Aug 2009
U.S.A.
11·139 Posts 
Quote:


Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Turn off GCC sseusing optimizations?  ewmayer  Programming  3  20160930 07:15 
AMD goes inane  jasong  jasong  18  20131115 22:54 
When I run PRIME95, my computer threatens to turn off  Rafael  Information & Answers  12  20120102 19:38 
A fond farewell  rogue  Lounge  10  20081121 05:25 
turn off your integrated Snd card in CMOS  nngs  Hardware  0  20050520 01:31 