20200623, 16:07  #45  
Jun 2020
29 Posts 
Quote:


20200623, 16:09  #46  
Jun 2020
29 Posts 
Quote:


20200623, 16:55  #47 
Aug 2006
5871_{10} Posts 
It's hard for me to believe we're five pages in and you still haven't defined your operation.
You have a function  not division, but your new take on it  which takes two arguments and returns a third. Let's call it BillyB(x, y) = z. For which pairs of x and y is BillyB(x, y) defined? When BillyB(x, y) is defined, how can BillyB(x, y) = z be computed? Are there some pairs x and y for which BillyB(x, y) = x/y or BillyB(x, y+1) = x/y? 
20200623, 17:37  #48 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
3339_{10} Posts 

20200623, 18:25  #49  
Jun 2020
1D_{16} Posts 
Quote:


20200623, 18:26  #50  
Jun 2020
29 Posts 
Quote:


20200623, 18:26  #51  
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2×3^{2}×7×67 Posts 
Quote:
Some dude that likely lives in rural 'merica at the end of a gravel road thinks he found something new with regards to basic math. It has been known for ~1500 years that division by zero is absurd. 

20200623, 19:30  #52 
Jun 2020
29_{10} Posts 
Why are you so offended by this? And no, you have me all wrong. How would anything new be created if it weren’t for new ideas?

20200623, 19:47  #53  
Bamboozled!
May 2003
Down not across
10202_{10} Posts 
Quote:
2) I agree wholeheartedly. That said, please define the function which has been called "BillyB". Here is a first take, based on what I have read so far. I am very far from infallible so my definition may be completely wrong. Let x and y be real numbers. BillyB(x, y) = x/y for all x, y where x and y are both nonzero. BillyB(x,0) = 1 for all x not equal to zero. At the moment I have no idea of the value of the only remaining case, viz BillyB(0,0). Please enlighten me. This is especially true for the third case, "0/0". Last fiddled with by xilman on 20200623 at 19:54 Reason: Remove otiose comma 

20200623, 20:48  #54  
"Ben"
Feb 2007
2^{2}×3^{2}×7×13 Posts 
Quote:
[edit] but that assumes some definitions... namely that x is the quantity or size of a cuttable object and y is the number of times to cut it into equal pieces. Then BillyB(x,y) = x / (y+1). Physically you can only cut something zero or more times so the domain of the function is >= 0. So, by that definition, there is no dividing by zero possible, by the everyday/ordinary definition of "divide". BillyB is not a division operation but some kind of splitting operation. [editedit] I suppose that must mean that x, y are in . The guess at a definition doesn't work otherwise.... Last fiddled with by bsquared on 20200623 at 21:06 

20200623, 23:08  #55  
Jun 2020
29 Posts 
Quote:


Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Prime number thought experiment  MooMoo2  Lounge  59  20180102 18:37 
Just a thought of Quark numbers.  SarK0Y  Miscellaneous Math  44  20111107 18:01 
A real GIMPS math thought  davieddy  Math  45  20110606 01:58 
I thought I found another one.....  schickel  Aliquot Sequences  0  20110221 03:52 
MPrime: K7 has 64KB of L1 cache... but I thought it had 128K!  optim  Hardware  2  20040710 19:59 