20200623, 14:03  #23 
Jun 2020
29 Posts 
Well since this is a new way of thinking about division that I believe is fully rational and logical anything other than that doesn’t appear naturally. I’m not trying to ignore it but it just wouldn’t present itself unless we already know about it. Since I’m not clear on what you are asking my notation is 1 cut 0 equals 1 thing at 100% of its original size. Does that help at all?

20200623, 14:07  #24 
Jun 2020
29 Posts 
1 cut 0 times equals no change to the thing. That is where a cut by 0 is defined. It is still the same thing that it started out as. That is the left side of the equation.

20200623, 14:08  #25 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
10000011111010_{2} Posts 
Cutting one physical thing into two pieces (one cut) = 1 / 2
Cutting one physical thing into 4 pieces (3 cuts) = 1 /4 Not cutting 1 thing = leaving it in 1 piece (zero cuts) = 1 / 1 Cutting 1 thing into zero pieces (an imaginary number of cuts) = 1 / 0 You are confusing the last 2. 
20200623, 14:11  #26  
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
20372_{8} Posts 
Quote:
Quote:


20200623, 14:11  #27  
Jun 2020
29 Posts 
Quote:
I’m using the parentheses for lack of better notation 

20200623, 14:12  #28 
Jun 2020
35_{8} Posts 

20200623, 14:17  #29  
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
2·2,819 Posts 
Quote:
And, no, simply repeating your representation of division by 1 does not address my question. Cutting a thing zero times is NOT division by zero, it is division by 1. 

20200623, 14:24  #30 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2×3^{2}×7×67 Posts 

20200623, 14:25  #31 
Jun 2020
29 Posts 
That is politely why this is a new thought on division. But they are separate. You can’t say the equal each other because they are different concepts combined together. But to be clear we are saying the same thing. One cut zero equals one. One cut one equals 2(1/2) which also equals one when multiplied together and so on and so on.

20200623, 14:27  #32 
Jun 2020
35_{8} Posts 

20200623, 14:28  #33 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2×3^{2}×7×67 Posts 
And what did the math folks say?

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Prime number thought experiment  MooMoo2  Lounge  59  20180102 18:37 
Just a thought of Quark numbers.  SarK0Y  Miscellaneous Math  44  20111107 18:01 
A real GIMPS math thought  davieddy  Math  45  20110606 01:58 
I thought I found another one.....  schickel  Aliquot Sequences  0  20110221 03:52 
MPrime: K7 has 64KB of L1 cache... but I thought it had 128K!  optim  Hardware  2  20040710 19:59 