![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Jan 2005
Transdniestr
503 Posts |
![]()
I was fiddling around with WolframAlpha the other day and came across this identity:
(x^(n+3)+x^n + x + 1) = (x+1)*(x^(n+2)-x^(n+1)+x^n+1) I hadn't seen it before and I was wondering if it's already known/in use for factoring larger numbers. This can be rearranged as (x^3+1)x^n+x+1 So, a more general identity could be derived from (x^(2m+1) + 1)x^n+ax+a |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Nov 2003
22×5×373 Posts |
![]() Quote:
It is trivial stuff from 1st/2nd year algebra. x^(n+3) + x^n = x^n(x^3+1). x^3+1 is trivially divisible by x+1. It is already known in the sense that it is so trivial that no mathematician would ever write it down or try to claim it as a "discovery". It is like the fact that 1+1=2. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Jan 2005
Transdniestr
1F716 Posts |
![]()
Fair enough, it's trivial, too trivial to label it an identity even. I was just wondering if it could be useful like say the Aurifeuillian factorizations are.
Specifically, if it was useful in factoring a large number relatively near a perfect power. And, obviously, x^3 + 1 is a trivial bit of algebra. That's why I pointed out a general version of this IN THE NEXT LINE. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bi-curvious Identity | jcrombie | Miscellaneous Math | 51 | 2013-09-09 18:51 |
Cpu Identity mismatch | only_human | Software | 2 | 2012-05-11 13:43 |
I had my identity stolen by '24' | ewmayer | Lounge | 12 | 2010-02-04 21:26 |
Number and identity of n-th roots of 1 mod p | SPWorley | Math | 6 | 2009-08-28 18:02 |
A missing identity | fivemack | Factoring | 4 | 2008-03-04 05:04 |