Some Somewhat Easier n^i Sequences Available for Termination - Page 16

unconnected · 2022-05-02, 15:11

Taking
93^75: 125/110
200^64: 139/116

birtwistlecaleb · 2022-05-03, 20:15

Taking 89^69

unconnected · 2022-05-04, 14:33

93^75 terminates with P104.

unconnected · 2022-05-05, 10:01

Taking 200^63 next
Upd: It is quickly terminates with P105.

EdH · 2022-05-06, 13:26

Someone (Anonymous) has been terminating whatever I add. I just added a few more, but my rate of adding is definitely slower than the rate of termination. Should I move the 140 digit threshold up a notch or two?

My original intent was to provide some easier terminations for those with lesser machine capabilities. I'm happy we brought in some newer members, but I think it will be more difficult to continue at this level.

garambois · 2022-05-06, 16:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by EdH

Someone (Anonymous) has been terminating whatever I add. I just added a few more, but my rate of adding is definitely slower than the rate of termination. Should I move the 140 digit threshold up a notch or two?

My original intent was to provide some easier terminations for those with lesser machine capabilities. I'm happy we brought in some newer members, but I think it will be more difficult to continue at this level.

Perhaps you can reduce the sequences to 145 or 143 digits instead of 140.
That will be less computation time for you and more for the others, since they seem to be getting ahead of you.
I don't know what others think ?

unconnected · 2022-05-06, 16:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by EdH

Someone (Anonymous) has been terminating whatever I add.

I've noticed this too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by garambois

Perhaps you can reduce the sequences to 145 or 143 digits instead of 140.

I agree with increasing threshold to 145 digits.

Taking 99^75 next.

EdH · 2022-05-06, 17:58

Moving to a 145 digit threshold would be very simple from my point and would immediately give a fair number of new sequences to the first post. Perhaps I will do that this evening. Any smaller sequences that may still show up will still make the list.

EdH · 2022-05-06, 18:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by EdH

. . . would immediately give a fair number of new sequences to the first post. . .

Actually, since I've been working with these sizes, taking them to 140, there aren't any left. I'm working at 147 digits already. However, I will shift my work to coincide with the new threshold starting now.

garambois · 2022-05-06, 19:00

OK, I think that's a good decision.
We'll see how it goes.

EdH · 2022-05-06, 22:01

For fun, I plan to add 1152 and 1250 bases to the listings, even though they aren't yet added to the project pages. This should supply some really trivial sequences and we may even get the bases fully initialized somewhat quickly so they can be added.

I have chosen these two bases because they are unreserved and are the next two doubled square bases. This means that all the sequences for the tables should terminate, unless we find another rare open-ended one.

I will hold all the terminations listed in this thread until such time as the tables can be added to the project. I'm hoping this won't be too labor intensive and will provide some easy sequences again, as well as helping out the project.

Depending on the success/failure of this trial, I may add in the next sets of double square bases later on.

2022-05-05, 10:01	#169
unconnected May 2009 Russia, Moscow 2²×5×139 Posts	Taking 200^63 next Upd: It is quickly terminates with P105. Last fiddled with by unconnected on 2022-05-05 at 10:27

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Unexpected termination of PM-1	Miszka	Software	22	2021-11-19 21:36
Easier pi(x) approximation	mathPuzzles	Math	8	2017-05-04 10:58
Would finding a definate Pi value easier if...	xtreme2k	Math	34	2013-09-09 23:54
Aliquot Termination Question - Largest Prime?	EdH	Aliquot Sequences	6	2010-04-06 00:12
A new termination below 100k	10metreh	Aliquot Sequences	0	2010-03-11 18:24

2022-05-02, 15:11	#166
unconnected May 2009 Russia, Moscow 2²·5·139 Posts	Taking 93^75: 125/110 200^64: 139/116

2022-05-03, 20:15	#167
birtwistlecaleb Jun 2021 2³·3·5 Posts	Taking 89^69

2022-05-04, 14:33	#168
unconnected May 2009 Russia, Moscow ADC₁₆ Posts	93^75 terminates with P104.

2022-05-06, 13:26	#170
EdH "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 17×271 Posts	Someone (Anonymous) has been terminating whatever I add. I just added a few more, but my rate of adding is definitely slower than the rate of termination. Should I move the 140 digit threshold up a notch or two? My original intent was to provide some easier terminations for those with lesser machine capabilities. I'm happy we brought in some newer members, but I think it will be more difficult to continue at this level.

2022-05-06, 17:58	#173
EdH "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 17·271 Posts	Moving to a 145 digit threshold would be very simple from my point and would immediately give a fair number of new sequences to the first post. Perhaps I will do that this evening. Any smaller sequences that may still show up will still make the list.

2022-05-06, 19:00	#175
garambois "Garambois Jean-Luc" Oct 2011 France 3²·97 Posts	OK, I think that's a good decision. We'll see how it goes.

2022-05-06, 22:01	#176
EdH "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 17×271 Posts	For fun, I plan to add 1152 and 1250 bases to the listings, even though they aren't yet added to the project pages. This should supply some really trivial sequences and we may even get the bases fully initialized somewhat quickly so they can be added. I have chosen these two bases because they are unreserved and are the next two doubled square bases. This means that all the sequences for the tables should terminate, unless we find another rare open-ended one. I will hold all the terminations listed in this thread until such time as the tables can be added to the project. I'm hoping this won't be too labor intensive and will provide some easy sequences again, as well as helping out the project. Depending on the success/failure of this trial, I may add in the next sets of double square bases later on.