mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2022-08-04, 15:08   #1
WillowW
 
WillowW's Avatar
 
"Willow"
Dec 2021
Germany

10102 Posts
Default Advice on choice of targets?

Hi all!

Another small question from a not-quite-so-newbie-as-last-time:

Since last we spoke, I finished up the remaining PrP checks on 123456xxx, and now I've been casting about for some charming numbers to work on.

I'd like to continue working in the 123xxxxxx range (yes, it's a whim, humor me), so I've been doing P-1 on numbers of the form 12345xxxx, since my little computer seems pretty happy and efficient with such tasks and it's a helpful stepping-stone for others to then do PrP.

I noticed, however, that there are 14 unverified LL and PrPs in the range 123xxxxxx, such as 123000023 („reliable“) and 123000169 („unverified“). I feel the urge to verify them, as a nice gesture to the people who made the effort to test them the first time.

So my question is: Is it better for the project to do *new* PrPs, rather than finishing up the once-verified? Or does it not make really any difference?

Any way, I'd appreciate your advice, even if maybe the question isn't answerable.

Thanks! Willow


P.S. Team NerdyGirls is a welcoming place for girls who love number theory. Just saying!! :D
WillowW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-08-04, 15:22   #2
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

101001100101002 Posts
Default

First, you should do what pleases you.

Second, if you want to run the tests to do the double checks, sure do that. The PRP on 123000023 does not have the proof file, so it needs to be rerun in full to verify it. The LL's obviously will too. Just be sure that once you add them to your queue, that you do a manual communication to server, so you get them assigned to you and avoid anyone also trying to get them assigned.

Does, it make a difference to the project which you do first? Seeing as how there are only 14, I would say clean them up (do the DC's), then do the others in the subrange you want (doing them as PRP's that generate the proof files.) This will make it such that when the wave front hits the 123M range, everything should get verified as the PRP's are turned in and the range will be all tidy. 123M is not too far above the wave front as to be to fanciful a range to work on.
Uncwilly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-08-04, 16:41   #3
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

11010000101002 Posts
Default

(Seconding)

LL first tests are more likely to be in error than PRP with GEC. So DC of those early would be good.

DC by PRP with proof generation (of PRP or LL first test) is the preferred method, both because it is more reliable and faster on average after considering error rates.
There's a lot of first testing occurring, and less DC effort. The wavefront of DC lags the wavefront of first testing by several years, ~48M exponent difference currently. Helping catch up on the DC backlog is very welcome. All productive efforts are welcome.

Experiment with different approaches, find what you like, & do that. Running PRP or PRP-DC with GEC is an effective way of checking the reliability of your hardware also.
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-08-05, 07:28   #4
WillowW
 
WillowW's Avatar
 
"Willow"
Dec 2021
Germany

A16 Posts
Default Target acquired :D

Thanks so much for your kind answers!

As soon as the P-1 runs on 12345xxxx wrap up, I'll start in on DC'ing the 123xxxxxx tests. With any luck, I might be able to get them done by Christmas.

'Til the next small question,
Willow

PS. 322222223 is a pretty cool prime number, even if it isn't a Mersenne prime. Thanks for that!
WillowW is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ready GNFS targets XYYXF XYYXF Project 87 2022-04-27 10:59
Too much choice! fivemack Factoring 1 2018-06-19 20:15
GNFS targets which need more ECM XYYXF XYYXF Project 295 2017-10-27 12:38
SNFS targets which need more ECM XYYXF XYYXF Project 57 2017-07-04 19:15
Ready SNFS targets XYYXF XYYXF Project 25 2016-11-20 21:35

All times are UTC. The time now is 16:52.


Wed Aug 17 16:52:43 UTC 2022 up 41 days, 11:40, 1 user, load averages: 1.61, 1.50, 1.44

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔