20180125, 06:55  #122 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2^{2}·3·13·73 Posts 
Reserving base 22 to n=30K.
I will doublecheck it to n=22K 
20180127, 22:47  #123 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
10110001111100_{2} Posts 
I did not forget them. The prime gap that I pointed out for b=34 is still the largest for b<38 and n<=30K. This includes both sides combined for each base.

20180130, 03:52  #124 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
6738_{10} Posts 
206, 208, 210, and 212 reserved Jiahao He via email

20180130, 20:39  #125 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2^{2}×3×13×73 Posts 
Base 22 is complete to n=30K. No primes were found for n=22K30K.
Base 22 was also doublechecked to n=22K. No problems found. All bases <= 40 are now complete to n>=30K. 
20180130, 20:42  #126 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2^{2}·3·13·73 Posts 
Base 26 was doublechecked to n=30K. No problems found.
Doublecheck status: Base 22 to n=22K. Base 26 to n=30K. Base 34 to n=10K. All other bases shown on primes page to n=2500. 
20180205, 16:12  #127 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
11388_{10} Posts 
Reserving base 42 to n=30K.
I will doublecheck it to n=10K. 
20180213, 16:30  #128 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2^{2}×3×13×73 Posts 
Base 42 is complete to n=30K. 2 primes were found for n=10K30K. Base released.
Base 42 and 44 were also doublechecked to n=10K. No problems found. 
20180213, 16:32  #129 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2C7C_{16} Posts 
Reserving base 46 to n=30K.
I will doublecheck it to n=10K. Reserving base 2026 to n=10K. I will doublecheck it to n=5526. Filling in the search holes. 
20180214, 05:33  #131 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
10110001111100_{2} Posts 
Base 2026 is complete to n=10K. No primes were found for n=552710K.
Base 2026 was also doublechecked to n=5526. No problems found. 
20180214, 10:16  #132 
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
2×5×1,013 Posts 
I was looking to those tables and saw that after 222 or so, the bases are not contiguous. I assume there is no search done for the missing bases, and the "higher" values just come from "people with a hobby" and not from an organized search. Because, unless I am not missing anything, I see no reason why the missing bases would not give primes. I think they do, and it should be no reason to jump from 222 to 228 (therefore missing 224 and 226) or from 2010 to 2026.
Now, the introduction done, for a week or so we were looking for an opportunity to test the new "multithreaded" tool from Mark (i.e. mtsieve). We picked CK numbers, and we picked the base 2018. As the current year, you know? We could not make the toy run in multithreaded mode (this is subject for another thread), but we got hooked and let it run overnight to sieve (single thread) and test with pfgw with some batch file. In the morning we had few (small) primes, and pfgw was close to testing n=12k or so. Does it make any sense reporting it? Or we are really missing the point (again, it won't be the first time, hehe). Last fiddled with by LaurV on 20180214 at 10:18 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Carol / Kynea Primes  rogue  And now for something completely different  256  20220517 19:50 
Carol / Kynea 2021 Project Goals  rogue  And now for something completely different  10  20211001 22:17 
Carol / Kynea half squares  sweety439  sweety439  3  20200329 23:41 
Carol / Kynea search (Nearpower primes)  rogue  And now for something completely different  37  20160618 17:58 
k=51 or about coordinated prime search  Kosmaj  Riesel Prime Search  7  20070713 22:15 