mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > And now for something completely different

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2018-01-25, 06:55   #122
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

22·3·13·73 Posts
Default

Reserving base 22 to n=30K.

I will doublecheck it to n=22K
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-27, 22:47   #123
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

101100011111002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweety439 View Post
Don't forget, the bases b<38 include bases 4, 8, 16, 32 and 36, although they are not shown in the webpage.
I did not forget them. The prime gap that I pointed out for b=34 is still the largest for b<38 and n<=30K. This includes both sides combined for each base.
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-30, 03:52   #124
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

673810 Posts
Default

206, 208, 210, and 212 reserved Jiahao He via e-mail
rogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-30, 20:39   #125
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

22×3×13×73 Posts
Default

Base 22 is complete to n=30K. No primes were found for n=22K-30K.

Base 22 was also doublechecked to n=22K. No problems found.

All bases <= 40 are now complete to n>=30K.
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-30, 20:42   #126
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

22·3·13·73 Posts
Default

Base 26 was doublechecked to n=30K. No problems found.

Doublecheck status:
Base 22 to n=22K.
Base 26 to n=30K.
Base 34 to n=10K.
All other bases shown on primes page to n=2500.
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-02-05, 16:12   #127
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

1138810 Posts
Default

Reserving base 42 to n=30K.

I will doublecheck it to n=10K.
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-02-13, 16:30   #128
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

22×3×13×73 Posts
Default

Base 42 is complete to n=30K. 2 primes were found for n=10K-30K. Base released.

Base 42 and 44 were also doublechecked to n=10K. No problems found.
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-02-13, 16:32   #129
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

2C7C16 Posts
Default

Reserving base 46 to n=30K.

I will doublecheck it to n=10K.

Reserving base 2026 to n=10K.

I will doublecheck it to n=5526.

Filling in the search holes.
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-02-13, 23:29   #130
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

2×3×1,123 Posts
Default

Gary has graciously taken over the coordination of this search. Please go to this page to view the current status.

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2018-02-21 at 20:39 Reason: correct link
rogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-02-14, 05:33   #131
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

101100011111002 Posts
Default

Base 2026 is complete to n=10K. No primes were found for n=5527-10K.

Base 2026 was also doublechecked to n=5526. No problems found.
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-02-14, 10:16   #132
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand

2×5×1,013 Posts
Default

I was looking to those tables and saw that after 222 or so, the bases are not contiguous. I assume there is no search done for the missing bases, and the "higher" values just come from "people with a hobby" and not from an organized search. Because, unless I am not missing anything, I see no reason why the missing bases would not give primes. I think they do, and it should be no reason to jump from 222 to 228 (therefore missing 224 and 226) or from 2010 to 2026.

Now, the introduction done, for a week or so we were looking for an opportunity to test the new "multi-threaded" tool from Mark (i.e. mtsieve). We picked CK numbers, and we picked the base 2018. As the current year, you know? We could not make the toy run in multi-threaded mode (this is subject for another thread), but we got hooked and let it run overnight to sieve (single thread) and test with pfgw with some batch file. In the morning we had few (small) primes, and pfgw was close to testing n=12k or so.

Does it make any sense reporting it? Or we are really missing the point (again, it won't be the first time, hehe).

Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2018-02-14 at 10:18
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Carol / Kynea Primes rogue And now for something completely different 256 2022-05-17 19:50
Carol / Kynea 2021 Project Goals rogue And now for something completely different 10 2021-10-01 22:17
Carol / Kynea half squares sweety439 sweety439 3 2020-03-29 23:41
Carol / Kynea search (Near-power primes) rogue And now for something completely different 37 2016-06-18 17:58
k=51 or about coordinated prime search Kosmaj Riesel Prime Search 7 2007-07-13 22:15

All times are UTC. The time now is 02:22.


Fri Oct 7 02:22:05 UTC 2022 up 49 days, 23:50, 0 users, load averages: 1.02, 0.90, 0.89

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔