![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
1,901 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
5·677 Posts |
![]() Quote:
![]() It'll mask the residue and hide things like user/computer name, checksums, etc that aren't really relevant, but otherwise that's what it turns in. There's actually a lot more to it because it seems like everyone who's ever written a program to do LL or TF testing had their own idea of what format that text should look like, so there's some specific parsing going on behind the scenes to figure out details like "okay, you TF's this exponent from what bit level to what bit level, and you did or did not continue factoring if you found a factor at some point?" So standardizing the raw result text is also a part of it to get the clean "no factor from x to y" text. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
another false positive? | ixfd64 | Data | 3 | 2016-03-14 22:11 |
Question about false positive process | Madpoo | Data | 3 | 2014-11-07 23:19 |
positive LL test? | sixblueboxes | PrimeNet | 90 | 2014-07-24 05:51 |
R.H. May be False? wtf | flouran | Math | 34 | 2009-12-08 00:09 |
False positive? | Pi Rho | Lounge | 4 | 2003-04-23 14:11 |