|
2016-03-14, 18:50
|
#1 |
|
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
5×499 Posts |
another false positive?
M78253603 has a 0x00000000000000__ residue but is marked as composite. I'm guessing it's really a 0x0000000000000002 residue. Someone look into this?
|
|
|
|
2016-03-14, 18:57
|
#2 | |
|
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
1101001110012 Posts |
Quote:
 What's odd is that it wasn't marked suspect... I vote that when a residue comes in like that, it should be marked suspect no matter what errors it reported during the run...clearly the end result is in error no matter what the program thought. EDIT: The same user has more of those all in the past few weeks... here's their full list of badness: 78253547 78253559 78253603 78253727 It makes me suspicious of their other result with a normal looking residue: M78253627 And if you're in the mood for these types of things, here's a bonus one from a different user last November: 79060367 Last fiddled with by Madpoo on 2016-03-14 at 19:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-14, 19:07
|
#3 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
23×1,021 Posts |
Yes, a CudaLucas 0x0000000000000002 residue. Nothing to see here. Madpoo or I need to shove it back in the first-time check queue.
|
|
|
|
2016-03-14, 22:11
|
#4 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
177508 Posts |
Result (and 5 others) removed from database. Exponent available for testing once again.
Server (finally) changed to reject any LL result with a residue of 0x0000000000000002 |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fun with a false positive | Madpoo | Data | 12 | 2016-06-29 19:00 |
| Question about false positive process | Madpoo | Data | 3 | 2014-11-07 23:19 |
| positive LL test? | sixblueboxes | PrimeNet | 90 | 2014-07-24 05:51 |
| R.H. May be False? wtf | flouran | Math | 34 | 2009-12-08 00:09 |
| False positive? | Pi Rho | Lounge | 4 | 2003-04-23 14:11 |
