![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Feb 2004
France
13·73 Posts |
![]()
Hi,
I've found this recent (2021, October 3rd) paper named "CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIALS AND HIGHER ORDER LUCAS LEHMER ALGORITHM", by KOK SENG CHUA, based on previous work by Pedja Terzi´c, and talking about the necessity part. This looks very interesting to me, since it provides a search about generalized Mersennes and the LLT (x^2-2). However, I've not spent yet enough time to read it, and it's not easy for me to understand it. So, I'd like to get comments from true mathematicians. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.02677.pdf Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Feb 2004
France
13·73 Posts |
![]()
The formula for Wagstaff numbers seems OK.
With Pari/gp . Code:
t(q)={w=(2^q+1)/3;S0=4;print("w: ",w);S=S0;for(i=1,q-1,S=Mod(S^2-2,w));s1=lift(Mod(S-5-9,w));s2=lift(Mod(S-5+9,w));print(s1," ",s2)} ? t(11) w: 683 665 0 ? t(13) w: 2731 0 18 ? t(17) w: 43691 43673 0 ? t(19) w: 174763 0 18 ? t(23) w: 2796203 2796185 0 ? t(29) w: 178956971 Not prime 59834419 59834437 ? t(31) w: 715827883 0 18 ? t(37) w: 45812984491 Not prime 24875527143 24875527161 ? t(41) w: 733007751851 Not prime 634893124730 634893124748 ? t(43) w: 2932031007403 0 18 ? t(61) w: 768614336404564651 0 18 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Feb 2017
Nowhere
3×13×167 Posts |
![]()
The sufficiency result (Lemma 2.1) requires a complete factorization of Q + 1 or Q - 1 in order to prove that Q is prime.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Mar 2021
Home
23×7 Posts |
![]()
I don't know if it's related to this topic but I made some probable primality test for numbers of the forum (a^p-1)/(a-1) and (a^p+1)/(a+1) using Chebyshev polynomials :
but the test isn't perfect and there are some conditions to apply : - a must not be a perfect power otherwise you can get false positive. - p must be a prime number >2 otherwise you can "break" the primality test and get false positive Let Let the sequence You can found the test here : https://sagecell.sagemath.org/?z=eJx...yLjgUAARUAuQ== For Let the sequence You can found the test here : https://sagecell.sagemath.org/?z=eJx...yLjgUAARUAuQ== For the moment I didn't get a counterexample If you found one please tell me. EDIT : (Second test fails for (a^3+1)/(a+1) apparently where a = 5 and 7) Last fiddled with by kijinSeija on 2022-06-12 at 21:20 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Higher order Wierferich prime pairs | carpetpool | Miscellaneous Math | 2 | 2018-04-15 00:28 |
Polynomials defining the same field as cyclotomic polynomial order 5 | carpetpool | carpetpool | 0 | 2017-04-19 20:33 |
Lucas-Lehmer test | Mathsgirl | Information & Answers | 23 | 2014-12-10 16:25 |
Lucas-Lehmer Test | storm5510 | Math | 22 | 2009-09-24 22:32 |
Lucas-Lehmer | Dougal | Information & Answers | 9 | 2009-02-06 10:25 |