mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2021-08-21, 08:13   #1332
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France

22×32×19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yoyo View Post
I'll take bases 276, 552 and 966.
Reservation and update made for these 3 bases.
Thank you very much, I will follow the evolution of the calculations with great attention.
garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-08-21, 08:53   #1333
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France

2AC16 Posts
Default

@bur and VBCurtis :

Thank you very much for your positive messages.
I think you are right and that we should see the project as you say.
All our calculations for this project will be at least as useful as others anyway, given the important role that integer powers play in number theory.
And I've said it all along : I didn't know if the data analyses would yield interesting results.
I was not intending to stop the project, but as you say, rather to take a break from data analysis.
If there is a general law to observe, it must be much more complicated than I could have imagined.
And if any of us were to find this law by observing the tables attached in my post #1328, then, we would be taking a giant step forward in the knowledge of aliquot sequences.
But maybe this law does not exist.
Or maybe we are missing some data. But what we are missing is rather larger exponents for each basis, that is my hunch. And we all know that it is impossible to increase the number of exponents for the bases.
But it is likely that in the future I will have to look at the data forgetting the original reason for creating the project.
There must be a lot of other interesting things to discover (or not !).

So let's get on with our calculations, all those who like it.
And when our intuition tells us it's time, maybe we'll look at the data again and notice some interesting things because of those calculations !


garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-08-21, 09:08   #1334
Happy5214
 
Happy5214's Avatar
 
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City

52·31 Posts
Default

I'm flattered, but 276^70 should be marked Anonymous. I didn't even explore above i=60 for any of the Lehmer five bases. It was probably your page-generating script that finished it off.

I've never been in this project for the conjectures, to be honest (other than fixing up your webpage). For me, it's all about the sequences being easier to work on than the main project, and filling in gaps to make the tables more complete. Keep shooting for the stars! We never know we'll find.
Happy5214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-08-21, 12:07   #1335
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

2·7·13·19 Posts
Default

Terminates:
54^70
54^72
55^73
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-08-22, 16:06   #1336
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France

22·32·19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy5214 View Post
I'm flattered, but 276^70 should be marked Anonymous. I didn't even explore above i=60 for any of the Lehmer five bases. It was probably your page-generating script that finished it off.
OK thanks.
Next update I'll put this sequence as calculated by an anonymous person.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy5214 View Post
Keep shooting for the stars! We never know we'll find.
You can trust me for that !


Quote:
Originally Posted by RichD View Post
Terminates:
54^70
54^72
55^73
OK thanks.
This will be taken into account in the next update.
garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-08-24, 11:12   #1337
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

2·7·13·19 Posts
Default

Terminates:
52^76
54^74
54^76
55^75

This concludes my work on these tables.

I'll start on bases 56, 57,59 and 60.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-08-27, 09:37   #1338
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

268110 Posts
Default

79^89 terminates!
BTW, I'm working on base 79 (odd n) up to 101.
unconnected is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-08-29, 09:31   #1339
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France

12548 Posts
Default

OK, I'm back from a few days of vacation.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RichD View Post
Terminates:
52^76
54^74
54^76
55^75

This concludes my work on these tables.

I'll start on bases 56, 57,59 and 60.
Thank you very much for this work.
The finished sequences will be taken into account in the next update.
For the initializations of the new bases, excellent !
Let me know when I should add them to our page.


Quote:
Originally Posted by unconnected View Post
79^89 terminates!
BTW, I'm working on base 79 (odd n) up to 101.
Thank you very much !
Reservations will be noted in the next update.
You want to do the calculations for the odd exponents up to 99, right (and not 101 which is not on the page ?) ?
garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-08-29, 14:58   #1340
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

A7916 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garambois View Post
You want to do the calculations for the odd exponents up to 99, right (and not 101 which is not on the page ?) ?
Yes.
unconnected is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-08-29, 15:44   #1341
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France

22·32·19 Posts
Default

WOW, OK, so good luck, because the calculations will be very long, a record for the project !
Several sequences exceed 170 digits !
79^93 and 79^99 will be formidable, as the terms have the factor 3.
garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-08-31, 22:25   #1342
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

2×7×13×19 Posts
Default

Base 56 can be added at the next update.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Broken aliquot sequences fivemack FactorDB 46 2021-02-21 10:46
Broken aliquot sequences schickel FactorDB 18 2013-06-12 16:09
A new theorem about aliquot sequences garambois Aliquot Sequences 34 2012-06-10 21:53
poaching aliquot sequences... Andi47 FactorDB 21 2011-12-29 21:11
New article on aliquot sequences schickel mersennewiki 0 2008-12-30 07:07

All times are UTC. The time now is 00:33.


Wed Dec 1 00:33:08 UTC 2021 up 130 days, 19:02, 0 users, load averages: 1.01, 1.23, 1.32

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.