![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Feb 2005
Colorado
25·19 Posts |
![]()
I just started my first PSP test using the Linux llrnet client.
First, I noticed it says it is based on LLR version 3.5.0. Isn't 3.6.2 faster? Second, a typical output line looks like this: 168451*2^1741500+1 , bit: 239000 / 1741517 [13.78% . Time per bit: It is strange to me that there is no closing bracket after the percentage, and that it is showing nothing after the "Time per bit:". Is this normal? Thanks in advance... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Apr 2003
22·193 Posts |
![]()
llrnet is based on llr 3.5.0 there is no implementation based on 3.6.2 yet.
There is an error in the progress output when used for sierpinski numbers. This error is already reported to the people at rieselsieve which created the llrnet client. Lars |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A few questions on Linux. | kracker | GPU Computing | 3 | 2012-08-17 21:57 |
LLRNet linux unable to resolve hostnames | nuggetprime | No Prime Left Behind | 16 | 2008-12-23 07:46 |
Linux build for LLRNet client available! | axn | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 9 | 2008-11-26 03:47 |
llrnet and linux 64 bits ... | tnerual | No Prime Left Behind | 13 | 2008-07-13 19:04 |
Linux and mprime pre-newbie questions | eepiccolo | Software | 4 | 2003-02-11 09:20 |