![]() |
![]() |
#298 |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
71328 Posts |
![]()
BTW, good to see you back. I may not have seemed cheerful enough in my previous message. Will you be back for a while?
Here are the ids for the troublesome candidates: Code:
1100000001046468738 size 2412 1100000000781996714 size 2531 1100000000953365184 size 2544 1100000001068764753 size 3927 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#299 |
Aug 2002
111110012 Posts |
![]()
If those become overly annoying to watch fail, I could delete them by script. I'm planning to be active for awhile, yes, and I could have been more courteous myself. There's no particular concrete need for me to work on the smallest numbers; I could take a small subrange between 4000 and 4100 dd, if nothing else.
As it stands, I'm happy to work below 3k for awhile, and will speak up if I get overwhelmed. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#300 | |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
E5A16 Posts |
![]() Quote:
However, my db use has somehow just been severely limited, in which case, I may stop entirely: Code:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#301 |
Sep 2009
34×52 Posts |
![]()
I've had a similar outage (or rather my script adding algebraic factors did). It started saying
Code:
You have reached the maximum of 4 parallel processing requests ?. Please wait a few seconds and try again. Code:
You have reached your hourly limit of 750 seconds CPU-time. It cleared after about 30 minutes. So it was probably a glitch in factordb since it hit us both at about the same time. Chris |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#302 | |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
E5A16 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I ended up leaving my Primo machines running, but stopped everything else. Maybe I'll bring the others back up and see what happens... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#303 |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
E5A16 Posts |
![]()
Hey Pakaran,
Are you still working from the 300 range up or are you grabbing anything in the 2xxx area? I see we're really gaining a bunch of candidates below 3xxx and wondered if I should move my lower bound back down some. I'll wait a couple days to hear from you before I make any downward move, but we seem to be gaining entries at a pretty healthy rate. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#304 |
"Nuri, the dragon :P"
Jul 2016
Good old Germany
11001001012 Posts |
![]()
Just noticed +10K PRP“s today, most of them where <300 digits.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#305 |
Aug 2002
3·83 Posts |
![]()
I am still working, will start a new "sweep" now.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#306 |
Aug 2002
3×83 Posts |
![]()
Over the weekend I uploaded certs for most numbers below ~1k dd (working in order of input file size). I'll keep going.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#307 |
Aug 2002
3718 Posts |
![]()
This week, on two occasions, I've seen numbers already proven when I uploaded them. Once, I had been running only a few hours before submitting them. If anyone else is working in the smaller numbers, I'd appreciate knowing to avoid duplication of effort. In the mean time, I'm going back to non-Primo tasks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#308 | |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
2·11·167 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I haven't any suggestions on how to proceed, unless you want to work the higher end of the range. The factordb default is 300 dd, so any new contributors would probably start there. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fixup Old Primo Certificate? | wblipp | FactorDB | 1 | 2012-05-28 03:16 |
Invalid certificate? | IvanP | FactorDB | 3 | 2012-05-11 12:17 |
Could Moore's law be purposely used for marketing purposes? | jasong | Science & Technology | 10 | 2007-01-19 19:04 |
certificate of appreciation | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 13 | 2004-04-28 06:24 |