mersenneforum.org Reservations
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2009-05-27, 09:17   #56
Thomas11

Feb 2003

35648 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Dougal im going to take all k's from 10000-100000 to n=10000.i have most of the sieveing done so i am going to start testing in the next day or two.when im finished i might bring all k's less than 100000 up as far as n=20000 or further.
Note, that I already tested all k=10000-30000 up to n=20000. kar_bon should already have the data...

2009-05-27, 09:51   #57
gd_barnes

May 2007
Kansas; USA

3×3,449 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Dougal im going to take all k's from 10000-100000 to n=10000.i have most of the sieveing done so i am going to start testing in the next day or two.when im finished i might bring all k's less than 100000 up as far as n=20000 or further.
Good luck getting all of that listed Karsten!

 2009-05-27, 10:51 #58 Dougal     Jan 2009 Ireland 2·3·31 Posts i was talking to karsten and he never mentioned that you had that range done.i have it testing at the minute,and i wont have access to the computer till monday so looks like il be doing alot of double checking.
 2009-05-27, 12:12 #59 kar_bon     Mar 2006 Germany 2×11×131 Posts sorry, Thomas is right! i wasn't aware of the data anymore. if i'm right there're about 208000 primes for 10000
2009-05-27, 12:56   #60
Thomas11

Feb 2003

190810 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kar_bon if i'm right there're about 208000 primes for 10000
You are right: 208068 primes and 3736 twin primes.

2009-05-27, 21:02   #61
cipher

Feb 2007

110100112 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kar_bon i really need another system to import/display those great amount of primes!
I agree. :) better system is needed.... still waiting on the confirmation for the gap for 10^7 to 10^8 see if i missed any. If not so i can move on to 10^8 to 10^9.

thanks
cipher

p.s: I know you are busy kar_bon... take your time.

Quote:
 Kar_bon move tp 10^8 and 10^9 and if you missed one, i inform you then thanks for the help!
Will do...

Last fiddled with by cipher on 2009-05-27 at 21:26

 2009-05-27, 21:06 #62 kar_bon     Mar 2006 Germany 1011010000102 Posts move tp 10^8 and 10^9 and if you missed one, i inform you then thanks for the help!
 2009-05-29, 23:57 #63 gd_barnes     May 2007 Kansas; USA 101000011010112 Posts Karsten, I'm reserving all k=100K to k=100M for n=1 to 100. I want to see how many primes and twins there are. I'll send you all of them when I'm through. It will be interesting to see which k has the most primes by n=100. For completeness, I'm hoping that you can get all of the k's and primes shown on your pages in the next 1-2 months along with their respective Nash weights, # of primes, for each, etc. Gary
2009-05-30, 08:10   #64
kar_bon

Mar 2006
Germany

2·11·131 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by gd_barnes Karsten, I'm reserving all k=100K to k=100M for n=1 to 100. I want to see how many primes and twins there are. I'll send you all of them when I'm through. It will be interesting to see which k has the most primes by n=100.
i've got k=100000-200000 with n=0-20000, so no need for this range.

Quote:
 For completeness, I'm hoping that you can get all of the k's and primes shown on your pages in the next 1-2 months along with their respective Nash weights, # of primes, for each, etc.
if no efforts will be done on the (now) three (RPS,NPLB,FreeDC) Riesel-projects, i got enough time to do so!

otherwise this have to be done later or in another matter (perhaps downloadable).

BTW:
i will not mark them reserved by you, is that ok for you?

Last fiddled with by kar_bon on 2009-05-30 at 08:11

 2009-06-04, 05:27 #65 gd_barnes     May 2007 Kansas; USA 3×3,449 Posts Now that's funny. You actually thought I was going to do such a ridiculous range. I was trying to get an "oh my gish" reaction out of you. Do you know how much time it would take for you to list all k's, # of primes, and Nash weights for k=100K-100M? Let me put it this way: Could you verbally count up to nearly 50 million in any reasonable time frame? Perhaps I'm underestimating you. Do you have a completely automated way to format all of those lines for k's on your pages and list their primes? Listing the primes would not be so hard to automate. Automating the showing of weights, # of primes, etc. along with appropriate coloration for low weight, high weight, 15 k's, etc. would be very difficult. You can breath easy now. lol Gary
2009-06-04, 05:48   #66
kar_bon

Mar 2006
Germany

1011010000102 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by gd_barnes Do you know how much time it would take for you to list all k's, # of primes, and Nash weights for k=100K-100M?
list like the others is not the great problem, i think.
display them or better put this html-page on screen for someone with only ISDN connection would be a livetime job
so as i said, a downloable (zip) file would be better!

Quote:
 Let me put it this way: Could you verbally count up to nearly 50 million in any reasonable time frame?
done! with a computer i can count much higher!

Quote:
 Perhaps I'm underestimating you. Do you have a completely automated way to format all of those lines for k's on your pages and list their primes? Listing the primes would not be so hard to automate. Automating the showing of weights, # of primes, etc. along with appropriate coloration for low weight, high weight, 15 k's, etc. would be very difficult.
to put an LLR-output file in the table-format i'm using for my html-pages, i can say: yes, i do! (counting # of primes and listing them with some constant data like contributor, date, search-range it's no problem).
i've not yet done this for nash-weight and colorations, and marking twins/SG of course.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post ET_ Operazione Doppi Mersennes 495 2020-12-19 19:41 fivemack PrimeNet 3 2016-02-08 17:58 R.D. Silverman NFS@Home 15 2015-11-29 23:18 R.D. Silverman Cunningham Tables 15 2011-03-04 21:01 paulunderwood 3*2^n-1 Search 15 2008-06-08 03:29

All times are UTC. The time now is 11:12.

Thu Apr 22 11:12:55 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 5:53, 0 users, load averages: 2.19, 1.78, 1.84