![]() |
![]() |
#958 |
Sep 2008
Kansas
63648 Posts |
![]()
Next is table 58.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#959 |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
7×17×31 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#960 | |
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City
26·32 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Last fiddled with by Happy5214 on 2021-03-07 at 09:54 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#961 |
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City
26·32 Posts |
![]()
@Jean-Luc: Any word on the redesigned web pages (either the sequence data or the conjectures)? As an aside, do you have access to any server-side scripting languages on your website? I still think a static page generated by an offline script is the way to go given the amount of data, especially given the way the sequence data is collected, but I am curious. In fact, a script to generate the conjecture page might be better than a handwritten HTML page, since it could automatically number the conjectures. In my mock-up, that's done by a CSS counter, which while convenient unfortunately takes most of the header content (like the number and the word "conjecture") out of the DOM and is bad for semantics and screenreaders.
I do have an improvement to the generator script for the sequence page. Does the script cache sequences that have been terminated? If not, it could save time by not requesting those from FactorDB every time and just using the cached data, which will not change again once terminated. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#962 | |
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France
2×32×31 Posts |
![]() Quote:
OK, so I understand that conjecture (138) is proven. Thanks to you for all this work ! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#963 | ||
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France
2·32·31 Posts |
![]() Quote:
And I will make this conjectures summary page on my website according to your example. However, I am very short on time. Right now I'm working on conjectures and programs. I also have to update the page regularly, which takes a long time. And since tomorrow I'm going back to work, I don't know when I'll do the conjectures page on my website : at worst, during my next vacation in mid April. But all these tasks are noted and pending ... ![]() Quote:
I am totally unable to answer this question. I'll let Karsten answer, if he sees this message and has a response. But I think right now he's working on it and maybe he's thinking about it all. In the meantime, I am working with the old scripts and the old page. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#964 |
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France
10568 Posts |
![]()
Page updated.
Thanks to all for your help ! Added bases : 38 and 46. New cycles : 39^9 and 439^46. 73 bases in total. I also corrected a reservation error for base 15015. I had reserved it for yoyo by mistake. I corrected and now it is reserved for me. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#965 |
Mar 2006
Germany
43·67 Posts |
![]()
The current script re-read only open sequences from FactorDB. Terminated seqs are collected with data of the last index separately.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#966 |
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany
22×32×17 Posts |
![]()
I'll take bases 38, 43, 46, 47.
yoyo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#967 |
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France
2×32×31 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#968 |
Sep 2008
Kansas
22·829 Posts |
![]()
Might have a merge with 58^7.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Broken aliquot sequences | fivemack | FactorDB | 46 | 2021-02-21 10:46 |
Broken aliquot sequences | schickel | FactorDB | 18 | 2013-06-12 16:09 |
A new theorem about aliquot sequences | garambois | Aliquot Sequences | 34 | 2012-06-10 21:53 |
poaching aliquot sequences... | Andi47 | FactorDB | 21 | 2011-12-29 21:11 |
New article on aliquot sequences | schickel | mersennewiki | 0 | 2008-12-30 07:07 |