Recommended bases and efforts - Page 8

MyDogBuster · 2015-01-13, 21:21

Quote:

eving on S6 with k=13215 with n between 1M and 2M. To be clear, the 200T = 200e9, right?

200T is 200e12 - 200e9 is 200B

wombatman · 2015-01-13, 21:24

Thanks.

gd_barnes · 2015-01-14, 16:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by wombatman

I'll run sieving on S6 with k=13215 with n between 1M and 2M. To be clear, the 200T = 200e9, right?

Sieving one k would not help us. You would need to sieve the entire file.

wombatman · 2015-01-14, 17:03

When I downloaded the sieve file, I realized that all the bases were mixed in, so I'm just sieving all of them. Sorry about that.

Batalov · 2015-01-14, 17:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by wombatman

When I downloaded the sieve file, I realized that all the bases were mixed in...

Really?
Bases or k values?

wombatman · 2015-01-14, 17:53

:

:

Yes, the k values. I think I need more caffeine.

gd_barnes · 2015-02-27, 06:45

I have added to the recommended lists the following:

1. All bases that are currently at n=10K with < 300 k's remaining.
2. The two lowest "relative difficulty" bases for n=100K-200K as shown on our unproven conjectures list. These both have 3 k's remaining and have fully sieved files.

One more suggestion not on the list: Some new Sierp bases with conjectures k<100K to n=10K. The Sierp bases are well behind the Riesel bases as to how many bases have been started. See the two untested bases threads for the big difference between the number of untested bases with conjectures k<100K.

I am continuing with the sieve of our Sierp base 6 file for P=220T-250T. ETA is about 3 weeks.

gd_barnes · 2015-03-28, 08:04

I am in the process of concurrently testing (on a single older 2.6 Ghz quad-core) all untested conjectures with CK<40000 to n=2500; 22 bases total; 3 Riesel and 19 Sierp bases. It should be done in 4-6 days. The two bases with the fewest number of k's remaining are complete. I have recommended them and the k's remaining are attached to the first post. With < 140 k's remaining at n=2500 S820 and S931 should not take too many resources to test to n=25K. As I finish the bases I will continue to add them as recommended with their k's remaining added to the attached folder.

I have a single reason for doing this at this point: The Riesel new bases have been tested quite a bit more than the Sierp bases, which has been an ongoing theme on the project almost from the time that it started.

Note that I am not removing these from the "untested Riesel and Sierp bases" threads until they are actually reserved for further testing.

gd_barnes · 2015-04-06, 04:54

Moved the discussion about future bases for BOINC testing and sieving to the BOINC effort thread here.

lalera · 2015-07-07, 11:20

i have a question
please can somebody tell me what the full range of k´s
for R465 is?
k=1 to ?

Puzzle-Peter · 2015-07-07, 13:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by lalera

i have a question
please can somebody tell me what the full range of k´s
for R465 is?
k=1 to ?

k=2 to 706689

2015-01-14, 17:53	#83
wombatman I moo ablest echo power! May 2013 1852₁₀ Posts	:::: Yes, the k values. I think I need more caffeine.

2015-02-27, 06:45	#84
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 2⁴·739 Posts	I have added to the recommended lists the following: 1. All bases that are currently at n=10K with < 300 k's remaining. 2. The two lowest "relative difficulty" bases for n=100K-200K as shown on our unproven conjectures list. These both have 3 k's remaining and have fully sieved files. One more suggestion not on the list: Some new Sierp bases with conjectures k<100K to n=10K. The Sierp bases are well behind the Riesel bases as to how many bases have been started. See the two untested bases threads for the big difference between the number of untested bases with conjectures k<100K. I am continuing with the sieve of our Sierp base 6 file for P=220T-250T. ETA is about 3 weeks. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2015-02-27 at 06:55

2015-07-07, 11:20	#87
lalera Jul 2003 7·89 Posts	R465 i have a question please can somebody tell me what the full range of k´s for R465 is? k=1 to ?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Cunningham ECM efforts	pinhodecarlos	Cunningham Tables	94	2023-02-01 06:43
Doublecheck efforts; S66/S79 to start with	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	16	2014-08-07 02:11
ECM efforts mistake?	10metreh	mersennewiki	1	2008-12-28 13:31
Recommended TF bit levels for M(>10^8)	NBtarheel_33	Math	19	2008-11-03 17:19
ECM Efforts	R.D. Silverman	Factoring	63	2005-06-24 13:41

2015-01-13, 21:24	#79
wombatman I moo ablest echo power! May 2013 2²·463 Posts	Thanks.

2015-01-14, 17:03	#81
wombatman I moo ablest echo power! May 2013 1852₁₀ Posts	When I downloaded the sieve file, I realized that all the bases were mixed in, so I'm just sieving all of them. Sorry about that.

2015-03-28, 08:04	#85
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 10111000110000₂ Posts	I am in the process of concurrently testing (on a single older 2.6 Ghz quad-core) all untested conjectures with CK<40000 to n=2500; 22 bases total; 3 Riesel and 19 Sierp bases. It should be done in 4-6 days. The two bases with the fewest number of k's remaining are complete. I have recommended them and the k's remaining are attached to the first post. With < 140 k's remaining at n=2500 S820 and S931 should not take too many resources to test to n=25K. As I finish the bases I will continue to add them as recommended with their k's remaining added to the attached folder. I have a single reason for doing this at this point: The Riesel new bases have been tested quite a bit more than the Sierp bases, which has been an ongoing theme on the project almost from the time that it started. Note that I am not removing these from the "untested Riesel and Sierp bases" threads until they are actually reserved for further testing.

2015-04-06, 04:54	#86
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 2⁴×739 Posts	Moved the discussion about future bases for BOINC testing and sieving to the BOINC effort thread here.