New LLR

scottsaxman · 2005-05-12, 16:35

Do we have the green light for upgrading to LLR 3.6?

paulunderwood · 2005-05-13, 06:00

I recommend it! I have not double checked any 321 Res64s, but Jean Penne assures us that all known primes in Chris Caldwell's database pass with the new LLR.

NEBOJSA · 2005-09-24, 03:55

Can we upgrade to LLR 3.6.2

paulunderwood · 2005-09-24, 07:38

Sure!

I have not tested it myself -- there is a problem with the Linux version on Pentium 4's and I'm awaiting a fix from Jean Penne, the author. Jean say's the new version (3.6.2) has been tested thoroughly against Chris Caldwell's database of large primes.

Jean Penné · 2005-09-26, 12:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by paulunderwood

Sure!

I have not tested it myself -- there is a problem with the Linux version on Pentium 4's and I'm awaiting a fix from Jean Penne, the author. Jean say's the new version (3.6.2) has been tested thoroughly against Chris Caldwell's database of large primes.

Thanks to your help, this problem seems to be fixed !

The two corrected Linux files are now on the GIMPS directory in place of the problematic ones.

Thank you again and best regards,

Jean

paulunderwood · 2005-09-26, 16:45

I have just double checked 777 numbers in the 321 range 290000-300000 without any mismatches shown between LLR3.6.2 and LLR-original (c April 2003).

Jean Penné · 2005-09-27, 14:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by paulunderwood

I have just double checked 777 numbers in the 321 range 290000-300000 without any mismatches shown between LLR3.6.2 and LLR-original (c April 2003).

Thank you for this QA work !

Now, I hope the project will find a new prime soon (but, where is this naughty one ???) !

2005-05-12, 16:35	#1
scottsaxman Aug 2004 way out west 1A₁₆ Posts	New LLR Do we have the green light for upgrading to LLR 3.6?

2005-05-13, 06:00	#2
paulunderwood Sep 2002 Database er0rr 2×2,063 Posts	I recommend it! I have not double checked any 321 Res64s, but Jean Penne assures us that all known primes in Chris Caldwell's database pass with the new LLR.

2005-09-24, 03:55	#3
NEBOJSA Sep 2005 7 Posts	Can we upgrade to LLR 3.6.2

2005-09-24, 07:38	#4
paulunderwood Sep 2002 Database er0rr 2·2,063 Posts	Sure! I have not tested it myself -- there is a problem with the Linux version on Pentium 4's and I'm awaiting a fix from Jean Penne, the author. Jean say's the new version (3.6.2) has been tested thoroughly against Chris Caldwell's database of large primes.

2005-09-26, 16:45	#6
paulunderwood Sep 2002 Database er0rr 2×2,063 Posts	I have just double checked 777 numbers in the 321 range 290000-300000 without any mismatches shown between LLR3.6.2 and LLR-original (c April 2003).