![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Mar 2019
1101112 Posts |
![]()
I have been studying some kind of numbers, the numbers that I have analyzed are of the form k*2^n-3 that never yield composite numbers and where k is a positive odd integer and I conjectured that 121 is the smallest k that never yields a prime number of the form k*2^n-3
Why do I think this conjecture is true? Well, I have checked n for 121 up to 31 and have not found any prime number. Thank you for reading. If you have any counterexamples, critics (as always ������), or ideas leave them in the comments please Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2019-04-16 at 22:36 Reason: post is completely replaced by MathDiggy. Attached is the screenshot of the original post |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
242E16 Posts |
![]()
Ahem....
x^n-y^n=z^n also means (rearranging...) x^n=z^n+y^n Doesn't it remind us anything? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Mar 2019
5·11 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Mar 2019
5·11 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
220568 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Mar 2019
5×11 Posts |
![]()
The ????? sign is a laugh emoji
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Mar 2019
5·11 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2×11×421 Posts |
![]()
I am not laughing - I don't even see your posts anymore. You are now on my "Ignore" list.
Bye! Of note: the original post was replaced full length with some other noise (fiddled by MathDoggy on 2019-04-16 at 13:18 ). That's not what people usually do here. Here is the screenshot of the original posting. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Mar 2019
5×11 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||
Jan 2019
Pittsburgh, PA
23×31 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Now, to show that 121 is the smallest k such that k*2^n-3 is not prime, you first need to show that each 1<=k<121, k*2^n-3 is not prime for every integer n>=0. Anyway, your assumption that \(121\cdot2^n-3\) cannot be a prime is false since \(121\cdot2^{9}-3=61949\) is a prime number. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
35×19 Posts |
![]()
It's one thing to post nonsense and learn from the replies you get; it's quite another to remove your entire post and replace it with something fully unrelated after being shown that you don't understand addition and subtraction. For me, that sort of hiding from your own ineptitude and misrepresenting what you said deserves a ban from even misc.math subforum.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
This conjecture may be useful. | reddwarf2956 | Prime Gap Searches | 2 | 2016-03-01 22:41 |
New Mersenne Conjecture | ATH | Math | 19 | 2014-12-05 16:21 |
About Zhou's conjecture | wreck | Math | 9 | 2014-05-04 14:37 |
Conjecture | devarajkandadai | Math | 13 | 2012-05-27 07:38 |
A New Conjecture | AntonVrba | Math | 19 | 2005-07-26 12:49 |