mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2017-12-28, 13:30   #67
pacionet
 
pacionet's Avatar
 
Oct 2005
Italy

3·113 Posts
Default

I try with M77324641
pacionet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-28, 13:37   #68
MushNine
 
MushNine's Avatar
 
Nov 2017
United Kingdom

13 Posts
Default

I thought the residue would be a string of zeroes for a prime. None of Jon's residue are such. So I suppose it's been removed from public record.
MushNine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-28, 13:40   #69
pacionet
 
pacionet's Avatar
 
Oct 2005
Italy

33910 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MushNine View Post
I thought the residue would be a string of zeroes for a prime. None of Jon's residue are such. So I suppose it's been removed from public record.
If i remember correctly, the server writes a "masked" residue for a probable prime.

Last fiddled with by pacionet on 2017-12-28 at 13:40
pacionet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-28, 13:43   #70
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

11·13·23 Posts
Default Woohoo!

Just finished my double-check:
Mxxxxxxxx is prime!

Looks like we have a winner, but my run was using the same Prime95 as the first result and I don't know if George will want to wait for the pending cudalucas check before making the exponent public. Traditionally I think that was the process.

I saved the interim partial residues every 1M iterations (starting at 36M since I forgot at first) so we'll be comparing the cudalucas run along the way.

But...yeah, the "Boxing Day Prime" looks good!
Madpoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-28, 13:45   #71
pacionet
 
pacionet's Avatar
 
Oct 2005
Italy

3·113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madpoo View Post
Just finished my double-check:
Mxxxxxxxx is prime!

Looks like we have a winner, but my run was using the same Prime95 as the first result and I don't know if George will want to wait for the pending cudalucas check before making the exponent public. Traditionally I think that was the process.

I saved the interim partial residues every 1M iterations (starting at 36M since I forgot at first) so we'll be comparing the cudalucas run along the way.

But...yeah, the "Boxing Day Prime" looks good!
I think we can say "Probably found M50 : it is ..." .
Come on. :)
pacionet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-28, 13:49   #72
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

7×467 Posts
Default

I didn't believe GIMPS would ever find another one.

We know the exponent is above 36 million now. There I was thinking it might have been the result of a triple check of a mistakenly verified test from years and year ago.
Brian-E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-28, 13:54   #73
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

29·101 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pacionet View Post
I think we can say "Probably found M50 : it is ..." .
Come on. :)
... higher than the last one ;)
Mark Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-28, 13:56   #74
pacionet
 
pacionet's Avatar
 
Oct 2005
Italy

3·113 Posts
Default

I hope this forum will be the first to know the newly discovered prime! Come on!
pacionet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-28, 14:08   #75
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

292910 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian-E View Post
I didn't believe GIMPS would ever find another one.

We know the exponent is above 36 million now. There I was thinking it might have been the result of a triple check of a mistakenly verified test from years and year ago.
Well we already knew that from earlier posted information. Ernst posted it would take at 72 hours to complete a run at 4 ms/iter, meaning it would be at least around 64 million.

Last fiddled with by Mark Rose on 2017-12-28 at 14:08
Mark Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-28, 14:13   #76
pacionet
 
pacionet's Avatar
 
Oct 2005
Italy

3·113 Posts
Default

I found Madpoo test, the prime could be M64764893 :) which seems have 3 LL (1 failed e 2 OK)

MadPoo
Manual testing
64764893
C
2017-12-28 13:29
1.8
163.7113
7B56C023189FB494


rudimeier
vinaka
64764893
C
2017-12-26 14:35
12.6
157.0998
7B56C023189FB494

Is it?

Last fiddled with by pacionet on 2017-12-28 at 14:21
pacionet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-28, 14:29   #77
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

23·211 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pacionet View Post
I found Madpoo test, the prime could be M64764893 :) which seems have 3 LL (1 failed e 2 OK)

MadPoo
Manual testing
64764893
C
2017-12-28 13:29
1.8
163.7113
7B56C023189FB494


rudimeier
vinaka
64764893
C
2017-12-26 14:35
12.6
157.0998
7B56C023189FB494

Is it?
Maybe a decoy?
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Merry Christmas everyone ... petrw1 Lounge 26 2013-01-02 23:01
Merry Christmas Everyone petrw1 Lounge 1 2010-12-25 07:54
Merry Christmas Everyone.... petrw1 Lounge 8 2009-12-25 16:09
Merry Christmas henryzz Lounge 10 2007-12-26 21:34
Merry Christmas! Prime95 Lounge 17 2006-12-26 19:31

All times are UTC. The time now is 01:47.

Mon Jan 25 01:47:24 UTC 2021 up 52 days, 21:58, 0 users, load averages: 1.92, 1.96, 1.92

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.