![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Feb 2007
3238 Posts |
![]()
yes @ range 5150-60T it usually will take 20sec~ to remove a factor. Its still 30times faster than doing LLR.
cipher |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Jun 2007
Seattle, WA
5 Posts |
![]()
How are you getting it on both cores? Run newpgen, set affinity, run another instance, set its affinity, and watch the candidates fall? :)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Apprentice Crank
Mar 2006
2·227 Posts |
![]()
I don't know about a Core2Duo, but this worked for me on a Pentium D (it also works for LLR if you run it alone, without using PrimeGrid or another BOINC project):
1.) Make a copy of NewPGen 2.) Put it into another folder 3.) Run first copy of NewPGen 4.) Open the other folder and run the second copy of NewPGen I left the affinity at the default values. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Dec 2006
Anchorage, Alaska
10011102 Posts |
![]()
Same as MooooMoo, I just set affinities because I think it is a little faster on my C2D and my Athlon X2's.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Jun 2007
Seattle, WA
516 Posts |
![]()
I'm more likely to set the affinities; the default is to use both, and I don't know if I trust WinXP to do the right thing all the time :)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Running 50% util on i5 and Core2 (same MHz) | SO7783 | Hardware | 13 | 2010-03-01 22:59 |
Optimizing Core2 quad in Windows XP | John Rheinstein | Hardware | 18 | 2009-09-23 16:14 |
Core2 kicks Core4 silicon butt | zs6nw | Hardware | 27 | 2009-07-08 05:37 |
Another Core2 Duo question | Ender | Hardware | 3 | 2007-02-08 00:12 |
Core2 X6800 Test Times | PrimeCrazzy | Hardware | 9 | 2006-08-29 08:34 |