mersenneforum.org Very Prime Riesel and Sierpinski k
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2009-11-13, 14:54   #78
R. Gerbicz

"Robert Gerbicz"
Oct 2005
Hungary

25·72 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Thomas11 BTW.: I haven't found any VPS for E=130 and E=138 so far. I know that they become quite rare with increasing E. But I'm a bit concerned about the "smith_check" levels. Should I relax those constrains a bit? E.g. there is a Riesel 97/10000 candidate I found earlier, which would have been thrown out already at the "10 50" level but otherwise would have survived the "smith_check" at all other (higher) levels.
You can also disable the whole "smith check" if you change the in.txt file line's to "smith_check 0". It will be slower but produce more solutions, the problem here is to maximize the number of found solutions/day, and this is far from trivial.

The other option is to edit the table by changing say "10 50" to for example "8 50". (By this the code will be also slower but produce a little more solutions.)

2009-11-14, 01:41   #79
robert44444uk

Jun 2003
Oxford, UK

2,039 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Thomas11 BTW.: I haven't found any VPS for E=130 and E=138 so far. I know that they become quite rare with increasing E. But I'm a bit concerned about the "smith_check" levels. Should I relax those constrains a bit? E.g. there is a Riesel 97/10000 candidate I found earlier, which would have been thrown out already at the "10 50" level but otherwise would have survived the "smith_check" at all other (higher) levels.
You should definitely lower the smith_check levels for 130 onwards if you want to find VPS. Here the series have fewer primes at low n and more at higher n.

For 130 my smith_check table looked as follows:

7 50
13 100
21 200
32 500
53 1000
65 2000
73 3000
89 6000

Look at my paper for prime frequencies at varying levels, this should help guide you on selecting the most appropriate levels.

2009-11-14, 01:46   #80
robert44444uk

Jun 2003
Oxford, UK

2,039 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Thomas11 I was quite excited when I hit a "116/10000", but unfortunately this one was already discovered earlier (S 2158430601663 66). So the highest unknown one is a still quite nice 110/10000 (S 5475497492533 58).
This the record holder! You can get excited if you find another or 116+ because that will be new

2009-11-14, 02:31   #81
robert44444uk

Jun 2003
Oxford, UK

2,039 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Thomas11 Meanwhile the number of VPS sequences from my end has increased to 116, out of which 80 are new. They are attached to this post, sorted by E and y. By factorizing the y values I've found that two of them are indeed candidates of the next higher E series (one 60 -> 66, and the other one 66 -> 82). They are indicated in the file (at the rightmost column).
OK one of these was a duplicate, after restating.

I have posted all of your new values, except the 130, so can you include this in your next file you send, which should exclude the values in the posted file.

The results to date (combined R & S)

Code:
primes total 52 58 60 66 82 100 106 130 138
100 181 43 39 35 30 22 7 3 0 1
101 127 22 25 28 28 19 3 1 1 0
102 83 11 16 15 22 12 4 1 1 0
103 70 11 15 20 14 7 0 1 2 0
104 52 10 8 13 14 4 2 1 0 0
105 34 6 7 7 6 6 1 1 0 0
106 21 2 3 4 8 3 1 0 0 0
107 15 2 4 4 4 1 0 0 0 0
108 4 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0
109 4 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
110 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
112 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
113 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
tot 595 108 118 130 131 74 18 8 4 1

 2009-11-14, 06:05 #82 robert44444uk     Jun 2003 Oxford, UK 203910 Posts Thinking ahead a bit, can anyone write a dos code for cllr.exe and cnewpgen.exe or its pfgw equivalent to work together without intervention, so that we can automate >10000 checking. An input file will look like: S 179782224211057 130 K=11806316649721727826033357267756435645 And the automated file will allow checking from n min to n max, with appropriate upper limit for p in cnewpgen.exe, output of prp-3 will go into a results file for each candidate. The output file name might be S_179782_130_[nmin]_n[max]_[# of primes found].txt and the file contents the value of prime n. Or perhaps a c code, in a dos shell, that does the same trick. Last fiddled with by robert44444uk on 2009-11-14 at 06:22
 2009-11-16, 08:13 #83 robert44444uk     Jun 2003 Oxford, UK 2,039 Posts Definitive Racing Records Below is a definitive list of payam racing records, which combines the old lists above with the new findings since Robert's program was written. It is short any information from Thomas 11 or R Gerbicz's finds on the Sierpinski side Code:  Overall S R 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 11 11 12 11 12 13 13 13 13 15 16 15 14 17 17 17 15 18 20 18 16 19 23 19 17 23 28 23 18 28 29 28 19 31 32 31 20 32 37 32 21 41 41 41 22 45 45 45 23 47 48 47 24 53 55 53 25 55 56 55 26 59 63 59 27 63 68 63 28 67 77 67 29 79 81 79 30 83 83 87 31 85 85 88 32 92 94 92 33 94 96 94 34 98 108 98 35 101 117 101 36 120 120 128 37 135 135 135 38 137 142 137 39 142 143 142 40 151 166 151 41 160 167 160 42 167 173 167 43 180 185 180 44 182 199 182 45 188 210 188 46 204 234 204 47 247 254 247 48 260 271 260 49 270 288 270 50 292 292 326 51 323 323 327 52 338 338 360 53 368 368 370 54 378 383 378 55 392 427 392 56 424 457 424 57 438 471 438 58 439 521 439 59 466 522 466 60 513 550 513 61 565 565 565 62 577 577 622 63 583 583 631 64 589 589 673 65 605 605 698 66 612 612 718 67 682 682 764 68 735 735 799 69 841 841 892 70 847 847 954 71 1001 1001 1102 72 1003 1003 1137 73 1044 1044 1171 74 1079 1079 1180 75 1244 1252 1244 76 1327 1327 1378 77 1399 1409 1399 78 1414 1418 1414 79 1421 1421 1495 80 1557 1557 1647 81 1634 1634 1693 82 1663 1663 1706 83 1684 1684 2014 84 1818 1818 2026 85 1844 1844 2028 86 1861 1861 2112 87 1880 1880 2190 88 1892 1892 2340 89 1946 1946 2398 90 1951 1951 2448 91 1971 1971 2589 92 2044 2044 2693 93 2130 2130 2826 94 2150 2150 3360 95 2227 2227 3500 96 2328 2328 3909 97 2393 2393 4420 98 3215 3215 4924 99 3224 3224 4926 100 3258 3258 5566 101 3289 3289 5871 102 3405 3405 5941 103 3436 3436 6537 104 3450 3450 6855 105 3722 3722 6974 106 3833 3833 7560 107 4172 4172 7826 108 4227 4227 8127 109 4337 4337 8486 110 4495 4495 9071 111 7544 7544 9282 112 8221 8221 9543 113 8720 8720 9903 114 9023 9023 12716 115 9277 9277 12856 116 9971 9971 14007
2009-11-16, 11:10   #84
Thomas11

Feb 2003

27·3·5 Posts

Here are some new VPS for E=52, 58, 60, 130, and 138.
All but one duplicates are removed from the list.
Just for your statistics I kept S 2965954850809 58 in the list,
which is already known as S 48622210669 60.

Still no 116+ candidates, but I found a very nice 115/10000!

Will post more results (e.g. for E=66, 82, 100, 106) tomorrow...
Attached Files
 results_20091116_nodub.txt (8.9 KB, 246 views)

2009-11-16, 15:05   #85
robert44444uk

Jun 2003
Oxford, UK

2,039 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Thomas11 Here are some new VPS for E=52, 58, 60, 130, and 138. All but one duplicates are removed from the list. Just for your statistics I kept S 2965954850809 58 in the list, which is already known as S 48622210669 60. Still no 116+ candidates, but I found a very nice 115/10000! Will post more results (e.g. for E=66, 82, 100, 106) tomorrow...
Luvverly jubby, as I would say in London, if I was there...but I am not.

115/10000..star!

Will update the master file. Heading towards 1000 new VPS

 2009-11-16, 15:14 #86 robert44444uk     Jun 2003 Oxford, UK 2,039 Posts I notice there have been several views of Thomas11's file. If anyone is working on these numbers please reserve the number in this thread and post the results. No-one can get to 200 primes without this being a team effort. A little co-ordination will go a long way. And yes, we need people to take these numbers forward. Don't be shy. We are now over 1000 known VPS (1027, R 577, S 450), of which 707 (452 Riesel, and 255 Sierpinski) are due to Robert G's program. We have a juicy 115, a 114, 1 113, 1 112, 1 111, 3 110, 4 109, 4 108, 19 107, 28 106, and 43 105. The most prime series might be one of these. Of great interest, as well as the obvious monsters we have 1 106 at 108/10000, 2 130's at 105/10000 and 3 138's at 100/10000. These have huge Nash weights. Last fiddled with by robert44444uk on 2009-11-16 at 15:47
2009-11-16, 18:51   #87
em99010pepe

Sep 2004

2×5×283 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by robert44444uk And yes, we need people to take these numbers forward. Don't be shy.
Please explain step by step how to set up the client. Thank you.

Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2009-11-16 at 18:52

 2009-11-16, 19:26 #88 Dougal     Jan 2009 Ireland 2·3·31 Posts program still crashing on me.anyone else have any problems?

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post sweety439 sweety439 11 2020-09-23 01:42 sweety439 Conjectures 'R Us 0 2016-12-07 15:01 robert44444uk Conjectures 'R Us 139 2007-12-17 05:17 rogue Conjectures 'R Us 11 2007-12-17 05:08 michaf Conjectures 'R Us 49 2007-12-17 05:03

All times are UTC. The time now is 17:53.

Sat May 28 17:53:18 UTC 2022 up 44 days, 15:54, 0 users, load averages: 1.03, 1.16, 1.22