![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Jun 2005
2·72 Posts |
![]()
Using my new proof for Wagstone numbers I hope to present a proof for a new class of primes.
allow a day or two for me to adapt the paper presented in my post of thread This method will only be of value if one can pick a to convince you, you could try: V_(12+5) = (2^12+5)/3=1367 5 -> 23 -> 527 -> 226 -> 495 -> 330 -> 905 -> 190 -> 556-> 192 -> 1320 -> 840 -> 226 or 19 -> 359 -> 381 -> 257 -> 431 -> 1214 -> 168 -> 882 -> 99 -> 230 -> 952-> 1348 -> 359 now the minus case and that q is prime is coincidental V_(13-5)= (2^13-5)/3 = 2729 2434 -> 2424 -> 237 -> 1587 -> 2429 -> 2670 -> 750-> 324 -> 1272 -> 2414 -> 979 -> 560 -> 2492 -> 1587 or 2220 -> 2553 -> 955 -> 537 -> 1822 -> 1218 -> 1675 -> 211 -> 855 -> 2380 -> 1723 -> 2304 -> 509-> 2553 or you can try for yourself: V_(13-23) = (2^13-23)/21 S_0 = 199, then S_2 = 15 = S_39 or S_0 = 6, then S_1 = 34 = S_13 Last fiddled with by AntonVrba on 2008-10-06 at 00:58 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
3×17×131 Posts |
![]() Quote:
But earlier you say:Which suggests a cycle length of 12. Hey this tex thing is interesting, I didn't know we could do that. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Jun 2005
6216 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Cycle bad terminology and my mistake S_q should have read S_n which has now been corrected in the post. Last fiddled with by AntonVrba on 2008-10-06 at 00:55 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Proving, for A > 1, (A+1)^n mod A = 0 | MushNine | Number Theory Discussion Group | 9 | 2018-01-04 03:29 |
Mersenne primes and class field theory | Nick | Math | 4 | 2017-04-01 16:26 |
Primality proving | CRGreathouse | Software | 13 | 2011-01-30 14:30 |
fastest general number primality-proving algorithm? | ixfd64 | Math | 3 | 2003-12-17 17:06 |
Countdown to proving M(6972593) is #38 down to less than 10! | eepiccolo | Lounge | 10 | 2003-02-03 05:15 |