![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
22·7·223 Posts |
![]()
Unfortunately there is still a bug in the code.
![]() It is missing factors under certain unknown conditions. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
22·7·223 Posts |
![]()
I'm still at a loss on this one. Sometimes I can run the code and get a nice OpenCL error at runtime, but I don't know why. The two are likely related. If I can track down the latter, the former might be fixed along with it.
Last fiddled with by rogue on 2014-12-29 at 19:11 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
141448 Posts |
![]()
As if I haven't stated this already, I recommend against anyone using MultiSieve. Not only will I not support it, it will not test n < b for either Cullen or Woodall sieves. For Cullens n can be less than b, but not for Woodalls so it is eliminating candidates that should not be eliminated.
The recommended method of building candidates for testing is as follows: 1) Run gwcsieve_smallp to to p = n. 2) Using the output from step 1, run gcwsieve for p > n. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Generalized Cullen and Woodall Searches | rogue | And now for something completely different | 40 | 2020-12-08 13:21 |
Generalized Cullen and Woodall numbers | em99010pepe | Factoring | 9 | 2019-03-26 08:35 |
Super Cullen & Woodall primes | Citrix | And now for something completely different | 1 | 2017-10-26 09:12 |
Cullen and Woodall altering on Prime Pages | jasong | jasong | 9 | 2008-01-25 01:51 |
Can we add Cullen and Woodall p-1ing here? | jasong | Marin's Mersenne-aries | 1 | 2007-11-18 23:17 |