mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2021-06-09, 18:03   #45
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009

1,987 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
...(like, you pose to have no idea if they are correct, but you know very well that this is a can of worms... typical troll).

I am not a troll. In my experience, a "troll" is someone who has little or nothing to offer and tries to offend others by behaving improperly. If nothing else, I try to be civil.

Attached is the image of the 39 hard drive setup I mentioned. He did a good job of arranging it all neatly, but was not forthcoming about going into a lot of detail about it. He did mention he has had 4 hits since starting. He is probably a long way from ROI though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lavalamp
Based on the number of plots and SMART data, my drives are averaging just shy of 1.4 TiB written per plot. Though I am also using 64 buckets instead of the default 128 to reduce reads,
Buckets?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mackerel
I was estimating on the magnitude of one hit a year. For the cost of running some old HDs, that's not a bad return.
I have never measured one of my setups under a moderate load without using a GPU. My i7 used to idle at 105W, before I replaced the HD with an SSD. When I run Prime95, this jumps to about 180W. Of course, there is very little drive activity. If I ran it this way for a full year, nonstop, the electrical cost would be just above $200. This is way below what I would have guessed.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	39-Chia.JPG
Views:	74
Size:	54.3 KB
ID:	25060  
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-09, 18:09   #46
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

23·5·251 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lavalamp View Post
I suppose it's not too bad as long as you know what you're buying, but still a staggeringly large portion of people believe they're losing more than whole terabytes now due to "ugh, windows formatting just does that."
caveat emptor.

Those who /do/ know what they're doing will sometimes "undersubscribe" their SSDs intentionally, depending on the use-case and risk-mitigation strategy.
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-09, 18:58   #47
M344587487
 
M344587487's Avatar
 
"Composite as Heck"
Oct 2017

2·3·5·29 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
caveat emptor.

Those who /do/ know what they're doing will sometimes "undersubscribe" their SSDs intentionally, depending on the use-case and risk-mitigation strategy.
There's probably a big overlap between intentional undersubscription and Linux 102: separation of root and home. I guess old folks will also make a point of making a swap partition. IMO if root needs more than 32GiB you're doing it wrong.
M344587487 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-10, 01:34   #48
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009

1,987 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lavalamp View Post
...I suppose it's not too bad as long as you know what you're buying, but still a staggeringly large portion of people believe they're losing more than whole terabytes now due to "ugh, windows formatting just does that."
How, exactly, does Windows formatting, or any other, do this? I have one Samsung 970 EVO 250 GB SSD. One partition or volume or whatever you want to call it. The maximum capacity of the partition is 250 billion bytes and a lot of change. There is no visible loss.

"Undersubscribed." For the record, I searched the web for over 30 minutes and found nothing relative to the size/capacity of SSD's, beyond one item which says an SSD with x advertised bytes can actually be x*3 bytes. I cannot see corporate types giving away free space. This makes less sense than my cat eating sawdust.
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-10, 02:46   #49
lavalamp
 
lavalamp's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Manchester, UK

2×3×227 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by storm5510 View Post
How, exactly, does Windows formatting, or any other, do this?
We've been over this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by storm5510 View Post
Some are insisting that 1 TB is equal to 1000^4 bytes and 1 TiB is 1024^4 bytes.

Last fiddled with by lavalamp on 2021-06-10 at 02:46
lavalamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-10, 14:30   #50
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

23×5×251 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by storm5510 View Post
"Undersubscribed." For the record, I searched the web for over 30 minutes and found nothing relative to the size/capacity of SSD's...
Depending on the use case (for example, a drive that will be experiencing a non-nominal amount of writes) there can be an advantage by not fully allocating the drive into partitions. This leaves additional capacity available for the device to swap out bad sectors.

This isn't as important nowadays as it once was. But it doesn't hurt (other than the "loss" of capacity, of course).
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-10, 14:33   #51
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

23·5·251 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M344587487 View Post
IMO if root needs more than 32GiB you're doing it wrong.
Agreed, with the exception of /var -- MariaDB can grow quite big sometimes.
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-10, 15:59   #52
PhilF
 
PhilF's Avatar
 
"6800 descendent"
Feb 2005
Colorado

2×11×31 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
Depending on the use case (for example, a drive that will be experiencing a non-nominal amount of writes) there can be an advantage by not fully allocating the drive into partitions. This leaves additional capacity available for the device to swap out bad sectors.

This isn't as important nowadays as it once was. But it doesn't hurt (other than the "loss" of capacity, of course).
That's called under provisioning, and is a common practice. It isn't so much that the unallocated space is available for bad sectors that's important, it is more for wear leveling. Wear leveling helps to prevent bad sectors from forming in the first place.

https://www.anandtech.com/show/6489/playing-with-op

Last fiddled with by PhilF on 2021-06-10 at 16:06 Reason: Added link to over/under provisioning for the geeks
PhilF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-10, 16:37   #53
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

234708 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilF View Post
That's called under provisioning...
Thank you for the correction of the nomenclature. And for the link. Sincerely.

If you can't name something, you can't control it! 8-)
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-10, 17:17   #54
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009

1,987 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
Depending on the use case (for example, a drive that will be experiencing a non-nominal amount of writes) there can be an advantage by not fully allocating the drive into partitions. This leaves additional capacity available for the device to swap out bad sectors.

This isn't as important nowadays as it once was. But it doesn't hurt (other than the "loss" of capacity, of course).
Clear as crystal. Thank you!

I read something a few days ago which indicated that SSD's reserve about 7% of their capacity for use as needed by the drive. Whether this applies to all makes, it did not say, but seems logical. They need something for reallocation, like mechanical types have done for a long time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lavalamp
We've been over this.
I will take your word for it. My memory is not what it used to be.
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-11, 17:14   #55
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009

1,987 Posts
Default

An image I lifted from Reddit. A guy bragging about buying 20 of these. They are 18TB Seagate Enterprise drives. Amazon's price is $749 each. He didn't say where he got these. If he were to have gotten them from Amazon, he would have paid nearly $15K for the group. Absolute lunacy.

IMO, this mass-purchasing by private individuals needs to be stopped cold. Only large commercial and industrial interests having business licenses should have access to bulk purchasing.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	20-18TB.JPG
Views:	69
Size:	36.0 KB
ID:	25089  
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bizzare thought about graphics card shortage tServo Hardware 3 2021-04-27 17:43
Cryptocurrency pyramid scheme Blackadder Soap Box 47 2021-04-25 17:08
Is there hope for the GPU shortage on the horizon? tServo GPU Computing 15 2018-03-08 22:20
How Bad Is The Shortage? storm5510 Software 19 2009-08-17 00:27
Blend test causing pc to become non-responsive... enyceexdanny Information & Answers 4 2008-01-17 18:02

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:31.


Mon Nov 29 08:31:16 UTC 2021 up 129 days, 3 hrs, 0 users, load averages: 1.38, 1.23, 1.16

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.