20070625, 19:22  #1 
Apr 2007
Spessart/Germany
A2_{16} Posts 
Is this to prove/already known?
Hello,
I got this conjecture last night, but my math is not good enough to prove it... if and only if is divisible by then there is a nonnegative Integer k with (= M(k) + 3) another conjecture: if n>1, n odd then is divisible by are these conjectures already known/proven? And if not, any idea how to prove them? I got them while looking in a selfcreated file with the (start of) factorisations of numbers of the form: , p prime (I made TF in this file up to 30 bit, if wanted I'll post it). Thanks in advance. mfg Matthias 
20070625, 21:12  #2 
Apr 2007
Spessart/Germany
2×3^{4} Posts 
hmhmhmhm,
something I made wrong. If then n is even, then n1 is odd, then n1 is not divisible by 2 as needed for . I made the division with a ShRorder, so the last bit was ignored. A corrected form of the first conjecture is: if and only if is divisible by then there is a nonnegative Integer k with mfg Matthias 
20070626, 10:58  #3 
Feb 2005
FC_{16} Posts 

20070627, 04:26  #4  
Apr 2007
Spessart/Germany
A2_{16} Posts 
Quote:
1) if why does this imply that for some k? (Probably I miss an easy thought...) 2) if n is even I still don't see why n must have the form , if is divisible by (not only by ). greetings, Matthias 

20070627, 05:35  #5  
Feb 2005
2^{2}×3^{2}×7 Posts 
Quote:
If then , and I showed that the latter congruence implies n=2^(k+1)+2 for some k. 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
So how must we be able to prove the following?  George M  Miscellaneous Math  5  20180102 11:11 
I have to prove everything  PawnProver44  Miscellaneous Math  40  20160319 07:33 
How can I prove this PRP prime?  siegert81  Math  2  20141119 10:24 
Why is RH so difficult to prove?  Damian  Math  31  20081003 02:11 
why not stop when composite is prove?  mdjvz  Software  4  20030928 17:13 