mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > XYYXF Project

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2016-02-08, 20:09   #23
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

23·13·37 Posts
Default

I'll take C184_135_106 for ECM to t55.

Based on recent comments by Fivemack, it seems we could have a few potential C18X GNFS candidates for the 15e queue of NFS@Home. Can anyone here run ECM to the required levels in the OP prior to attempting GNFS? Or is this something for yoyo?

Even individuals running some curves at the t55 level will be very helpful.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-02-14, 21:29   #24
XYYXF
 
XYYXF's Avatar
 
Jan 2005
Minsk, Belarus

24·52 Posts
Default

I think yoyo would definitely help with t60.
XYYXF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-02-22, 14:28   #25
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

23·13·37 Posts
Default Additional GNFS Numbers

Further test sieving has identified the following list of GNFS candidates:

C193_136_129
C193_143_93
C196_135_124
C193_131_124
C185_134_99
C190_147_80
C194_144_91
C197_141_86
C183_127_118
C188_132_125
C195_130_121
C186_145_72
C191_143_75
C192_139_81
C182_125_121
C191_143_76
C183_134_69
C187_142_59

For all of these, test sieving by SNFS is considerably slower than the estimated GNFS sieving time. All have been run up to the t50 level for ECM.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-02-23, 00:19   #26
XYYXF
 
XYYXF's Avatar
 
Jan 2005
Minsk, Belarus

24·52 Posts
Default

Thank you Sean.

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
For all of these, test sieving by SNFS is considerably slower than the estimated GNFS sieving time.
How about C177_132_91 and C178_131_81? Are they definitely GNFS targets?
XYYXF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-02-23, 00:42   #27
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

1111000010002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XYYXF View Post
Thank you Sean.

How about C177_132_91 and C178_131_81? Are they definitely GNFS targets?
I'm not sure. We need to generate a good poly and run some test sieving comparing S/GNFS. And that is not worth doing until all ECM is run.

Personally, I hope ECM factors both of them!

ETA: When do you plan to push the five numbers that have survived t55 over to yoyo for higher ECM? Just curious.

Last fiddled with by swellman on 2016-02-23 at 00:48
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-02-23, 01:41   #28
XYYXF
 
XYYXF's Avatar
 
Jan 2005
Minsk, Belarus

24×52 Posts
Default

Currently 15e is loaded enough, maybe a bit later :)
XYYXF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-02-27, 12:39   #29
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

2·7·461 Posts
Default

I am about to have spare GPU resource to do 10k@6e8 on some number (this will take all of March).

Which number should I pick? Current thought is either C190_149_91 or C193_136_129, which are the numbers of that digit count with highest SNFS:GNFS difficulty ratio.
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-02-29, 12:04   #30
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

23×13×37 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivemack View Post
I am about to have spare GPU resource to do 10k@6e8 on some number (this will take all of March).

Which number should I pick? Current thought is either C190_149_91 or C193_136_129, which are the numbers of that digit count with highest SNFS:GNFS difficulty ratio.
Bump. Not sure XYYXF has seen this posting.

If this were a poll (which it is not), I would go with C190_149_91. It has already seen t55 and is ready for the big stuff.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-02-29, 19:47   #31
XYYXF
 
XYYXF's Avatar
 
Jan 2005
Minsk, Belarus

24·52 Posts
Default

I'd also prefer C190.
XYYXF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-03-01, 00:01   #32
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

2×7×461 Posts
Default

OK, 416*25 curves started on C190_149_91
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-04-02, 00:32   #33
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

F0816 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
I'll take C184_135_106 for ECM to t55.
Completed 18000 curves @B1 = 11e7 with no factors found. Releasing number.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ready GNFS targets XYYXF XYYXF Project 87 2022-04-27 10:59
SNFS targets which need more ECM XYYXF XYYXF Project 57 2017-07-04 19:15
Ready SNFS targets XYYXF XYYXF Project 25 2016-11-20 21:35
3,697+ (GNFS 220.9) pinhodecarlos NFS@Home 0 2014-12-24 19:13
3,766+ (GNFS 215.5) pinhodecarlos NFS@Home 34 2014-04-01 21:27

All times are UTC. The time now is 01:09.


Thu Feb 2 01:09:57 UTC 2023 up 167 days, 22:38, 1 user, load averages: 0.87, 0.96, 0.96

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔