Certificate : For all indents and purposes - Page 19

EdH · 2017-05-12, 13:07

@pakaran: There are currently just over 2600 below 994 dd. About 600 of those are 993 dd. I'm going to move down to include 994 dd today. Let me know if you want the 993 dd range. If not, I'll get those too.

pakaran · 2017-05-12, 21:06

I'm reorganizing, after submitting the numbers I got done this week (work was quite busy, so I forgot to submit). I hope we didn't duplicate effort. In any case, I'm re-organizing to get the smallest numbers done, and just downloaded the first 100 PRPs; that will also give factordb time to validate the 700 or so I just uploaded, and give us a better idea of what's really remaining.

EdH · 2017-05-13, 14:05

I didn't hit anything below 994 and there has been greater than 2000 below that pretty steadily, so I don't think there would have been any duplication... It looks like you had just under 700 accepted.

For now I'll stay at 994 dd, then, at least until I hear something else from you. That still leaves over 2000 below that point.

If at some point you want to work some larger numbers, let me know. I'm trying to keep the area between my main focus at 3500-3600 dd down to my lower bound somewhat clear. Of course, as that region grows, so does its difficulty.

EdH · 2017-05-13, 15:01

Just after my last post here, 10⁴ new PRP entries have shown up in the db.

Coincidence?

EdH · 2017-05-13, 17:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by EdH

Just after my last post here, 10⁴ new PRP entries have shown up in the db.

Coincidence?

Interesting! I see now that the number is back down by the 10000 it was up. Was that possibly just a huge load of really small PRPs that got taken care of right away?

Puzzle-Peter · 2017-05-16, 14:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by EdH

Anyone with a suggestion?:

Code:

[Candidate 1]
Input=primo_1100000000294457850.in
...
Status=Failed, impossible to certify the candidate

Just in case, I ran all the bases which resulted in no change from PRP.

I didn't try the UGS=1 that worked for the error code, since this isn't the same form of message. Should I?

Thanks for any thoughts...

I tried to run the number and it worked without any error messages

EdH · 2017-05-16, 14:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puzzle-Peter

I tried to run the number and it worked without any error messages

Thank you! Three machines gave me the same message after quite a time running. I did try UGS=1 on one of the machines, too. I was about to send a message to the author about it. I'm running version 4.2.1 is your version different?

Puzzle-Peter · 2017-05-16, 14:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by EdH

Thank you! Three machines gave me the same message after quite a time running. I did try UGS=1 on one of the machines, too. I was about to send a message to the author about it. I'm running version 4.2.1 is your version different?

As I have a really big certificate still running, I am stuck to V4.1.1.

I think Marcel Martin will be interested in hearing about this.

EdH · 2017-05-16, 14:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puzzle-Peter

As I have a really big certificate still running, I am stuck to V4.1.1.

I think Marcel Martin will be interested in hearing about this.

I shall send a message to him a bit later...

EdH · 2017-05-17, 22:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by EdH

I shall send a message to him a bit later...

I received a note back from Mr. Martin:

Code:

In order to certify your number, either with 4.1.1 or with 4.2.1,
set the sieve parameters with (3000 dd, 32 bits). Once you get the
first test (around table 12 or 13), abort Primo, reset the Sieve
Parameters with the default values and resume the certification.
It should work.

Best,
mm

EdH · 2017-05-19, 15:57

@Pakaran: PRPs are stacking up again - almost 3000 below 994 now. Are you working at all with 993 dd? If not, I'm going to hit the 800+ of them in a day or two.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Fixup Old Primo Certificate?	wblipp	FactorDB	1	2012-05-28 03:16
Invalid certificate?	IvanP	FactorDB	3	2012-05-11 12:17
Could Moore's law be purposely used for marketing purposes?	jasong	Science & Technology	10	2007-01-19 19:04
certificate of appreciation	Unregistered	Information & Answers	13	2004-04-28 06:24

2017-05-12, 13:07	#199
EdH "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 2²×1,307 Posts	@pakaran: There are currently just over 2600 below 994 dd. About 600 of those are 993 dd. I'm going to move down to include 994 dd today. Let me know if you want the 993 dd range. If not, I'll get those too.

2017-05-12, 21:06	#200
pakaran Aug 2002 F9₁₆ Posts	I'm reorganizing, after submitting the numbers I got done this week (work was quite busy, so I forgot to submit). I hope we didn't duplicate effort. In any case, I'm re-organizing to get the smallest numbers done, and just downloaded the first 100 PRPs; that will also give factordb time to validate the 700 or so I just uploaded, and give us a better idea of what's really remaining.

2017-05-13, 14:05	#201
EdH "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 2²×1,307 Posts	I didn't hit anything below 994 and there has been greater than 2000 below that pretty steadily, so I don't think there would have been any duplication... It looks like you had just under 700 accepted. For now I'll stay at 994 dd, then, at least until I hear something else from you. That still leaves over 2000 below that point. If at some point you want to work some larger numbers, let me know. I'm trying to keep the area between my main focus at 3500-3600 dd down to my lower bound somewhat clear. Of course, as that region grows, so does its difficulty.

2017-05-13, 15:01	#202
EdH "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 2²×1,307 Posts	Just after my last post here, 10⁴ new PRP entries have shown up in the db. Coincidence?

2017-05-19, 15:57	#209
EdH "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 2²×1,307 Posts	@Pakaran: PRPs are stacking up again - almost 3000 below 994 now. Are you working at all with 993 dd? If not, I'm going to hit the 800+ of them in a day or two.