mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2022-05-22, 19:03   #584
S485122
 
S485122's Avatar
 
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

1,831 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
I think the idea is that instead of running GCD once at the end of (B2=B1*100) it could be run multiple times as B2 is expanded, for example run it 10 times at successively higher B2 values (B2=B1*10*[1..10]).
That's how I interpret S485122's suggestion anyways.
...
This is indeed what I tried to convey (with my usual typo's, - instead of + for instance :-(
S485122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-23, 01:35   #585
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

10101000111002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
That may allow you to find the stage-2 factor sooner (if less than the target B2 is required), but unless B1 is extended to above that factor then you still have the problem of more than 1 factor between B1 and B2.
Precisely.
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-23, 08:14   #586
S485122
 
S485122's Avatar
 
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

72716 Posts
Default

What triggered my idea was that with such big B2 there would be more potential factors with more than one factor between the bounds... But, as you remarked, the only way to get over that is augmenting B1. I looked at it from the wrong side :-(

Last fiddled with by James Heinrich on 2022-05-23 at 14:09 Reason: bbcode typo
S485122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-23, 20:46   #587
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

11010101000002 Posts
Default MD5 failure repeatable

Quote:
Originally Posted by kriesel View Post
On prime95 v30.8b14, I recently had a proof file generation failure related to a repeating md5 error....
Code:
[May 18 17:26] Gerbicz error check passed at iteration 109399424.
[May 18 17:26] Iteration: 109400000 / 109400569 [99.99%], ms/iter: 11.389, ETA: 00:00:06
[May 18 17:26] Gerbicz error check passed at iteration 109400513.
[May 18 17:26] Gerbicz error check passed at iteration 109400562.
[May 18 17:27] Generating proof for M109400569.  Proof power = 9, Hash length = 64
[May 18 17:27] Root hash = C86D7AD04B90BDD8FCB4E48C9907D9156AAD51150977A27431DA6B542DED____
[May 18 17:27] MD5 error reading PRP proof interim residues file.
[May 18 17:27] Waiting 5 minutes to try proof generation again.
[May 18 17:27] Waiting five minutes before restarting.
[May 18 17:32] Root hash = C86D7AD04B90BDD8FCB4E48C9907D9156AAD51150977A27431DA6B542DED____
[May 18 17:32] MD5 error reading PRP proof interim residues file.
[May 18 17:32] Proof generation failed.
[May 18 17:32] M109400569 is not prime.  RES64: F8C22837950CF___. Wh4: 7EE818E2,37645848,00000000
[May 18 17:32] Setting affinity to run helper thread 1 on CPU core #2
[May 18 17:32] Setting affinity to run helper thread 3 on CPU core #4
[May 18 17:32] Setting affinity to run helper thread 2 on CPU core #3
[May 18 17:32] Starting Gerbicz error-checking PRP test of M109593851 using FMA3 FFT length 6M, Pass1=768, Pass2=8K, clm=2, 4 threads
[May 18 17:32] Preallocating disk space for the proof interim residues file \\ostrich\prp-proof-cache\p109593851.residues
[May 18 17:36] PRP proof using power=10 and 64-bit hash size.
[May 18 17:36] Proof requires 14.0GB of temporary disk space and uploading a 151MB proof file.
[May 18 17:40] Iteration: 20000 / 109593851 [0.01%], ms/iter: 11.292, ETA: 14d 07:42
Sorry, that was v30.7b9. And it is repeatable, continuing from a 2022-05-15 savefile restored from backups.
Code:
...
[May 22 14:45] Iteration: 109400000 / 109400569 [99.99%], ms/iter: 11.407, ETA: 00:00:06
[May 22 14:45] Gerbicz error check passed at iteration 109400513.
[May 22 14:45] Gerbicz error check passed at iteration 109400562.
[May 22 14:46] Generating proof for M109400569.  Proof power = 9, Hash length = 64
[May 22 14:46] Root hash = C86D7AD04B90BDD8FCB4E48C9907D9156AAD51150977A27431DA6B542DED____
[May 22 14:46] MD5 error reading PRP proof interim residues file.
[May 22 14:46] Waiting 5 minutes to try proof generation again.
[May 22 14:46] Waiting five minutes before restarting.
[May 22 14:51] Root hash = C86D7AD04B90BDD8FCB4E48C9907D9156AAD51150977A27431DA6B542DED____
[May 22 14:51] MD5 error reading PRP proof interim residues file.
[May 22 14:51] Proof generation failed.
[May 22 14:51] M109400569 is not prime.  RES64: F8C22837950CF___. Wh4: 7EE818E2,37645848,00000000
[May 22 14:51] Setting affinity to run helper thread 1 on CPU core #2
[May 22 14:51] Setting affinity to run helper thread 2 on CPU core #3
[May 22 14:51] Setting affinity to run helper thread 3 on CPU core #4
[May 22 14:51] Resuming Gerbicz error-checking PRP test of M61740193 using FMA3 FFT length 3360K, Pass1=448, Pass2=7680, clm=4, 4 threads
[May 22 14:51] PRP proof using power=12 and 64-bit hash size.
[May 22 14:51] Proof requires 31.6GB of temporary disk space and uploading a 100MB proof file.
[May 22 14:51] Iteration: 2071446 / 61740193 [3.35%].
[May 22 14:51] Iteration: 2080000 / 61740193 [3.36%], ms/iter:  5.774, ETA: 3d 23:41

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2022-05-23 at 20:48
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-25, 12:32   #588
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)

135528 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S485122 View Post
What triggered my idea was that with such big B2 there would be more potential factors with more than one factor between the bounds... But, as you remarked, the only way to get over that is augmenting B1. I looked at it from the wrong side :-(
If multiple factors are found you will just get a composite factor found which is probably trivially factored.
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-25, 16:08   #589
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

25×3×71 Posts
Default ProofPower apparently overrides residues file size limit

This was seen on a prime95 v30.8b14 instance:

prime.txt entry
Quote:
[PrimeNet]
ProofPower=12
apparently overrides
local.txt entry
Quote:
WorkerDiskSpace=160
(which is options, resource limits, temporary disk space GB)

since I have a 220GB p4400000107.residues preallocated file in that case.
212 * 440000107/8 ~ 225,280,054,784 bytes ~ 220,000,054 KiB
The file is indicated as 220,000,128 KB (225,280,131,072 bytes) by Windows Explorer, and by dir at the cmd line
Quote:
05/24/2022 08:39 PM 225,280,131,072 p440000107.residues
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-25, 16:25   #590
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

1110111110002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kriesel View Post
ProofPower=12 prime.txt entry apparently overrides local.txt entry WorkerDiskSpace=160
Presumably ProofPower is normally auto-selected based on available disk space, but you're telling it to ignore available disk space and use the ProofPower you explicitly set.
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-29, 10:55   #591
pepi37
 
pepi37's Avatar
 
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)

62716 Posts
Default

Prime 30.8 last build (15)



On my system I have 16 GB RAM. Setup 3 workers with two cores each ( I5-9600k)
Also I setup memory 4 GB in Prime95

So why I get this error? ( but on random , sometimes is without this)

Quote:
[May 29 12:48:33] Inversion of stage 1 result complete. 5 transforms, 1 modular inverse. Time: 0.710 sec.
[May 29 12:48:34] Exceeded limit on number of workers that can use lots of memory.
[May 29 12:48:34] Looking for work that uses less memory.

worktodo entry

Pminus1=879497,2,3333815,1,200000,800000

Last fiddled with by pepi37 on 2022-05-29 at 10:56
pepi37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-29, 11:22   #592
sdbardwick
 
sdbardwick's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
North San Diego County

7×107 Posts
Default

Is MaxHighMemWorkers set in local.txt?
sdbardwick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-29, 14:05   #593
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

23×479 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pepi37 View Post
16 GB RAM. ... 3 workers with two cores each ( I5-9600k) ... memory 4 GB in Prime95
If you have so little RAM available, it would be better to just have one worker with 6 threads. If you try to run more than one P-1 at a time, Prime95 will have to pick unnecessarily low bounds.
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-29, 14:42   #594
pepi37
 
pepi37's Avatar
 
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)

32·52·7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdbardwick View Post
Is MaxHighMemWorkers set in local.txt?
This fixed problem :)
Thanks!
pepi37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do not post your results here! kar_bon Prime Wiki 40 2022-04-03 19:05
what should I post ? science_man_88 science_man_88 24 2018-10-19 23:00
Where to post job ad? xilman Linux 2 2010-12-15 16:39
Moderated Post kar_bon Forum Feedback 3 2010-09-28 08:01
Something that I just had to post/buy dave_0273 Lounge 1 2005-02-27 18:36

All times are UTC. The time now is 00:56.


Mon Sep 26 00:56:50 UTC 2022 up 38 days, 22:25, 0 users, load averages: 1.28, 1.08, 1.06

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔