![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2×3×293 Posts |
![]()
It is already known that there are an infinite number of Pythagorean Triples, for instance:
3n, 4n, 5n where n is a natural number But are there an infinite number of families of Pythagorean Triples? Prove your answer. So in the previous example: 3, 4, 5 6, 8, 10 9, 12, 15 12, 16, 20 . . . Counts as only one Pythagorean Triple family. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
23·113 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Your (3,4,5) example is a primitive triple, as is (5,12,13). Only those triples (a,b,c) for which gcd(a,b,c) =1 are primitive, so (6,8,10) is not a primitive Pythagorean triple, though it is indeed a Pythagorean triple. Paul |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2·3·293 Posts |
![]()
(3, 4, 5) and (5, 12, 13) count as separate families
(3, 4, 5) and (6, 8, 10) do not. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Jun 2003
The Texas Hill Country
32×112 Posts |
![]() Quote:
(3,4,5) : k=1, n=1 (6,8,10) : k=2, n=1 (5,12,13) : k=1, n=2 from the parametric form (k*(2*n+1), k*(2*n*(n+1)), k*(2*n*(n+1)+1)) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Aug 2002
1 Posts |
![]()
The most interesting formula for Pythagorean Triples I know is the following:
Pick any two numbers U and V a = u^2 - V^2 b = 2UV c = U^2 + V^2 A few examples: Let V = 1 and let U be an even number. u = 2 gives (3, 4, 5) u = 4 gives (15, 8, 17) u = 6 gives (35, 12, 37) u = 8 gives (63, 16, 65) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Aug 2003
68 Posts |
![]()
another one is
1)take any odd number 2)square it 3)divide by two 4)the short side will be step (1) the other two will be step(3) +- .5 ex: 3^2 is 9 9/2 = 4.5 (3, 4.5-.5, 4.5+.5) (3,4,5) 15^2 = 225 225/2 = 112.5 (15, 112, 113) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Aug 2003
Upstate NY, USA
2×163 Posts |
![]()
and it is this last formulation that allows you to prove there exist infinitely many families (well .... it gives the easiest of the formulations given)
One thing to note (making the proof even simpler) is that you have that each odd number produces a new family since the second and third differ by 1 in all cases, so they cannot be a multiple of a smaller such triple. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
20th Test of primality and factorization of Lepore with Pythagorean triples | Alberico Lepore | Alberico Lepore | 43 | 2018-01-17 15:55 |
Final Lucas Lehmer residuals and Pythagorean triples | a nicol | Miscellaneous Math | 21 | 2017-12-19 11:34 |
Basic Number Theory 13: Pythagorean triples and a few Diophantine equations | Nick | Number Theory Discussion Group | 2 | 2016-12-18 14:49 |
pyth. triples and primes | bhelmes | Math | 2 | 2016-07-20 10:34 |
Pythagorean triples | Rokas | Math | 3 | 2005-01-02 03:50 |