mersenneforum.org The time was 1,666,666,666
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2022-10-25, 12:27 #1 retina Undefined     "The unspeakable one" Jun 2006 My evil lair 29·229 Posts The time was 1,666,666,666 Taking the Linux epoch and adding 1,666,666,666 seconds gives 2022-10-25 02:57:46+00:00 At time of posting that was about 9 1/2 hours ago. The previous interesting time was 666,666,666 seconds. 1991-02-16 01:11:06+00:00 The next interesting time will be 6,666,666,666 seconds. 2181-04-04 11:51:06+00:00 Or, if you are not sure if you can make till then, try for 2,666,666,666 seconds. 2054-07-03 04:44:26+00:00 The future times given are merely aspirational. Leap seconds, both plus or minus, won't alter the given values because UTC is stupid. For those using TAI or similar you are on your own to figure it out. Good luck predicting the leap seconds 158 years into the future. Last fiddled with by retina on 2022-10-25 at 12:29
2022-10-25, 13:20   #2
xilman
Bamboozled!

"๐บ๐๐ท๐ท๐ญ"
May 2003
Down not across

2D3D16 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by retina Taking the Linux epoch and adding 1,666,666,666 seconds gives 2022-10-25 02:57:46+00:00 At time of posting that was about 9 1/2 hours ago. The previous interesting time was 666,666,666 seconds. 1991-02-16 01:11:06+00:00 The next interesting time will be 6,666,666,666 seconds. 2181-04-04 11:51:06+00:00 Or, if you are not sure if you can make till then, try for 2,666,666,666 seconds. 2054-07-03 04:44:26+00:00 The future times given are merely aspirational. Leap seconds, both plus or minus, won't alter the given values because UTC is stupid. For those using TAI or similar you are on your own to figure it out. Good luck predicting the leap seconds 158 years into the future.
I suggest the next interesting time will s2G --- when signed 32-bit time-t variables go negative.

2022-10-25, 13:32   #3
retina
Undefined

"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

147618 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by xilman ... s2G ...
2038-01-19 03:14:07+00:00

 2022-10-25, 14:10 #4 kriesel     "TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17" Mar 2017 US midwest 2·32·5·79 Posts Cool, I missed 1901 the first time. Might have a shot at the second go-round. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem As usual, VMS shone here too. "While the native APIs of OpenVMS can support timestamps up to the 31st of July 31086, the C runtime library (CRTL) uses 32-bit integers for time_t. As part of Y2K compliance work that was carried out in 1998, the CRTL was modified to use unsigned 32-bit integers to represent time; extending the range of time_t up to 7 February 2106." Windows' 64-bit counter of 100ns ticks from 1600-01-01 provides a range of ~58,494.2417 years if unsigned. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/...ond-resolution It would be good to be current on NTP server version. https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/584606/ Where I used to work, we had an expensive DEC Printserver20 letter/ledger duplexing network printer shared by VMS Vaxes to a PC network, that quit working in September 1999. (99/09/09 I think.) By then the Vaxes were being replaced by Windows NT PCs and we were wrapping up Y2K readiness there, and the printer was several years old and outclassed by what was available new at less cost, so we sold it off and replaced it. The actual Y2K rollover was a nonevent for us, anticlimactic. So much so that the boss thought for a while that meant we could ignore IPV6 readiness to the last moment. Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2022-10-25 at 14:40
 2022-10-25, 14:29 #5 xilman Bamboozled!     "๐บ๐๐ท๐ท๐ญ" May 2003 Down not across 101101001111012 Posts I remember seeing a clock in New Zealand display the year as 19100. Someone had used string concatenation instead of arithmetic addition. All power went out in MSFT's UK headquarters on the dot of 12:00 on the 99th day of 1999. Remarkably little failed, mostly because everyone had been paying attention for years before but that didn't stop me being on call-out alert for the period around 2000.000
2022-10-25, 22:22   #6
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

32×17×71 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by xilman Remarkably little failed, mostly because everyone had been paying attention for years before but that didn't stop me being on call-out alert for the period around 2000.000
Yeah... Few appreciate how much work goes into ensuring stuff doesn't fail... 24/7/~52...

Our small team of ~50 people was in our office, monitoring stuff...

We weren't running any Cobol, so /most/ everything was fine...

The young just have no idea...

Last fiddled with by chalsall on 2022-10-25 at 22:26 Reason: s#24/7/365#24/7/~52# ; # Special case regex; I don't get out much...

2022-10-26, 01:03   #7
sweety439

"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36

41·89 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by retina The previous interesting time was 666,666,666 seconds. 1991-02-16 01:11:06+00:00
Isn't 1,000,000,000 seconds interesting?

2022-10-26, 01:18   #8
retina
Undefined

"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

147618 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by sweety439 Isn't 1,000,000,000 seconds interesting?
Sure, if you like.

1B is 2001-09-09 01:46:40+00:00
2B is 2033-05-18 03:33:20+00:00
3B is 2065-01-24 05:20:00+00:00
10B is 2286-11-20 17:46:40+00:00
100B is 5138-11-16 09:46:40+00:00
1T is 33658-09-27 01:46:40+00:00

Perhaps your greatn-grandchildren will celebrate 1T seconds with a big solar system spanning party.

2022-10-26, 03:00   #9
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

32×17×71 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by sweety439 Isn't 1,000,000,000 seconds interesting?
I /think/ I understand your humor. I hope you et al understand my seriousness.

I'm currently working in a space that requires sampling at 10 kHz. Multiple channels. Clever code; dedicated co-processor.

Jolly good fun. And, very efficient.

I trust that makes sense...

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post davar55 Lounge 4 2013-02-23 02:40 bcp19 Software 1 2012-08-03 22:39 benjackson Prime Sierpinski Project 16 2008-07-29 07:26 Xyzzy Science & Technology 26 2008-01-19 03:28 PrimeCruncher Software 30 2003-12-21 05:26

All times are UTC. The time now is 23:14.

Fri Dec 2 23:14:25 UTC 2022 up 106 days, 20:42, 0 users, load averages: 0.70, 0.75, 0.88

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

โ  ยฑ โ รท ร ยท โ โ โฐ โ โ โ โ โ โค โฅ โฆ โง โจ โฉ โบ โป โผ โฝ โ โ โ โ ยฒ ยณ ยฐ
โ  โ ยฐ โ ~ โ โ โซ
โก โ โ โ โ โช โซ โโ โโ โ โ โ โ โง โจ โฉ โช โจ โ โ ๐ ๐ ๐ โฒ โณ
โ โ โ โฆ โฃ โฉ โช โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โค โ โ โ โต โถ โท โธ ๐
ยฌ โจ โง โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โด โต โค โฅ โข โจ โซค โฃ โฆ โฏ โฎ โฐ โฑ
โซ โฌ โญ โฎ โฏ โฐ โ โ ฮด โ โฑ โ โ
๐ข๐ผ ๐ฃ๐ฝ ๐ค๐พ ๐ฅ๐ฟ ๐ฆ๐๐ ๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ช๐ ๐ซ๐ ๐ฌ๐ ๐ญ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐ฏ๐ ๐ฐ๐ ๐ฑ๐ ๐ฒ๐ ๐ด๐๐ ๐ต๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ท๐๐ ๐ธ๐ ๐น๐ ๐บ๐