mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > CADO-NFS

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2022-08-11, 15:51   #100
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

15B416 Posts
Default

When I first discovered that the stock params were not very fast, I sent new files to the CADO folks for C100 to C120. Some of them were accepted, others were deemed not a useful improvement. One of the developers explained that the team uses an automated params testing suite to determine the stock params, and I got the sense they were not particularly interested in my efforts to find faster ones.

Quite a few years have passed since then, and I've learned a lot about parameter choices. Perhaps I should send the team my most-improved params files once again, as I've found more and more speed over the years.
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-08-15, 12:24   #101
bur
 
bur's Avatar
 
Aug 2020
79*6581e-4;3*2539e-3

10010110012 Posts
Default

Yes, I thought that maybe they focus more on the development of the software and bleeding edge parameters than those smaller ones. Still, it would be very interesting for publication (not peer-reviewed, just to make it public).

Will you post the updated c155 params shortly? Not to sound impatient, I just want to make sure I don't start factorization and then 3 hours later it's posted. :)

Last fiddled with by bur on 2022-08-15 at 12:25
bur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-08-15, 14:18   #102
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

22·3·463 Posts
Default

I'm working this week on C140 and C145; I seem to have lost the trendline here, having trouble finding settings fast enough to match my expectations based on C120 and C130 timings.
I won't be publishing C150 and C155 for a while still.
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-08-16, 05:36   #103
bur
 
bur's Avatar
 
Aug 2020
79*6581e-4;3*2539e-3

601 Posts
Default

Ok, good to know.
bur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-09-15, 15:41   #104
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.

2,389 Posts
Default

I still use all the stock parameters from the original installation which was recently. A document refers to this version as 3.0.0. I have all the newer parameter files posted here on a USB drive. Should I replace the original ones or leave them alone?
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-09-15, 17:50   #105
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

22·3·463 Posts
Default

You should get the 2022 parameters from the thread so marked, and replace your stock files. I mean, unless you prefer jobs taking 10-40% longer than they need to- it's not like you must replace the parameters files to run the program.

Some of the factory CADO params are fine, like C110; others have weird choices that cost a ton of speed. In most cases, the poly select params I use make jobs about 2 digits easier than the factory settings; that's the bigger boost than sieve params.
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-09-17, 14:19   #106
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.

2,389 Posts
Default

I just happened to see the warning below as it appeared on the screen. This was after the parameter file updates.

Code:
Debug:HTTP server: 127.0.0.1 Translated path cgi-bin/upload.py to /home/levi/cado-nfs/scripts/cadofactor/upload.py
Info:HTTP server: 127.0.0.1 Sending workunit c130_sieving_5040000-5060000 to client localhost+2
Debug:HTTP server: 127.0.0.1 "GET /cgi-bin/getwu?clientid=localhost+2 HTTP/1.1" 200 -
Warning:Command: Process with PID 862234 finished with return code 2
Info:Filtering - Singleton removal: After purge, 7583130 relations with 7388066 primes remain with excess 195064
Info:Filtering - Singleton removal: Not enough relations
Info:Filtering - Singleton removal: Requesting 1735649 additional relations
Info:Filtering - Duplicate Removal, removal pass: Got request for 29512333 (1735649 additional) output relations, estimate 42565082 (2503293 additional) needed in input
Info:Lattice Sieving: New goal for number of relations is 42565082, currently have 40061789. Need to sieve more
Debug:Filtering - Singleton removal: Exit PurgeTask.run(purge)
Info:Complete Factorization / Discrete logarithm: Filtering - Singleton removal
Info:Filtering - Singleton removal: Total cpu/real time for purge: 77.42/80.55
Info:Lattice Sieving: Starting
Much of the time, I would have never seen this as I wouldn't be paying any attention or the monitor would be turned off. I may have gotten it before and not known about it. CADO properly finished the process.
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-11-03, 12:46   #107
thornado123
 
Apr 2022

22 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by orever View Post
Is this another case of a secret number or can you say the number?

Maybe with ECM you can factor faster, or is it an RSA key?
Hi Sorry for the late super reply. Yes it is a RSA key but we are still testing our software offline so I can post our testing PK. The only problem is if we make a release with a 640bit key...

Our testing public key is:
Code:
N:3258005875255212804435711892724048997709841623079090536527862146732351426484056684475910406742090087618411947018308228277114851649885017479304690479085490775846701637841220085809920785148488781
E: 65537
I haven't had any lock with getting Faas to work again. And it is sadly not in the factordb!

Last fiddled with by VBCurtis on 2022-11-03 at 20:06 Reason: added code tags
thornado123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Posting log files or other text files Xyzzy Forum Feedback 3 2018-12-30 19:37
Improved NFS polynomial selection jasonp Operation Kibibit 5 2014-09-07 11:02
CADO-NFS skan Information & Answers 1 2013-10-22 07:00
could oddperfect's ecm progress page be improved? jasong GMP-ECM 11 2007-05-30 03:08
Factoring progress has really improved! eepiccolo Lone Mersenne Hunters 3 2003-04-12 02:04

All times are UTC. The time now is 00:15.


Tue Dec 6 00:15:56 UTC 2022 up 109 days, 21:44, 0 users, load averages: 0.82, 0.78, 0.79

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔