![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Sep 2002
23·37 Posts |
![]()
I have three computers that are running prime95 right now that could be wisked away at anytime to be formated and disturbuted
I tried makeing 3 diffrent folders on a machine that was going to be there longer and then exe it from the network drive but it was awfully slow and it used alot of bandwith does anyone know a way were prime will back up its progress every so often to a diffrent drive than it lives ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Sep 2003
Borg HQ, Delta Quadrant
2·33·13 Posts |
![]()
From undoc.txt:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sep 2002
23·37 Posts |
![]()
so change WorkingDir=your_directory_name to \\whatevercomputer\whatever unique folder?
does it work over the network ( if you know off the top of your head ) im going to test it here in a bit thanks i saw that before but i never saw the workdir part (guess i need to read better) thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Sep 2003
Borg HQ, Delta Quadrant
2·33·13 Posts |
![]()
I assume it works over the network, though I haven't actually tried it. But yes, \\computername\shared_folder_name should do it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Sep 2002
23·37 Posts |
![]()
good news
\\whatever\c\whatever works bad news prime runs at about 16% and the network useage on a 100mb full duplex lan goe to about 12% so is there a way to have the working dir the dir that prime is in but save one back up file localy and the other over the network? i dont need prime to work off the other computer but just to store a back up there incase it gets tapped to go out on the floor or something like that |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Mar 2003
New Zealand
22058 Posts |
![]()
Maybe there is a problem is with the network? The only real traffic caused by Prime95 is a few MB to load the .exe then a few more MB each time the save file is created (assuming you are LL testing), it should not even be noticable.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Sep 2002
23×37 Posts |
![]()
its a enterprize grade network
we have 500 employies i dont know how 12mb could take that long espasually since they are both on the same switch try it your self see if you get the same results |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471
29×41 Posts |
![]()
Is there any difference if you map a drive letter to your share and then write to that drive letter?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Aug 2002
London, UK
5C16 Posts |
![]()
My experience is that it can take a long time (may be as much as two minutes
![]() Writing the save files, although taking longer than on a local hard drive, is much quicker - a second or two? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Dec 2003
23×33 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I had a method for Windows 95 too back in '97, involving a Samba share on a Linux machine, and a couple of registry entries to run a batch file which backed up to that share on startup and at user login. But that would require Administrator access with modern Windows, I think. And with modern Windows you probably have a cron equivalent which can schedule the job at specific times. I don't know if regular users can set up cron jobs on Windows. The Samba share had the same name everywhere, but by Samba magic that share would be a separate directory for each machine mounting it. The machine local batch file just called another batch file, backup.bat, on the server. This way I could improve backup.bat without reinstalling it on a lot of computers. First backup.bat checked if Prime95 was installed. If it was, it would back up the directory with the save files. If not it would reinstall Prime95 with the save files on the server, and set up to run the batch file at startup and login in case that information was lost too. When a machine was reinstalled, I just had to run the backup script from the Samba server to get it back up and running Prime95 with the old save files. I could run the same script on new machines to install Prime95 for the first time. In fact I think backup.bat was generated on demand by the Samba server. It generated a local.ini with the netBIOS name of the Windows machine as ComputerID. It must have got that from Samba (I think more modern Windows' have this in an envirorment variable. %COMPUTERNAME% or something.) Unfortunately the server was retired in '99, and the batch files have gone to heaven. Disclaimer: I am not a Windows user. Last time I did anyting useful on a Windows machine, except running Putty or setting up prime95, was in '98. There are probably far smarter ways to do all this on Windows in 2004, and I don't even know if my old way would work anymore. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Sep 2003
Borg HQ, Delta Quadrant
2BE16 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Saving disk space? | Xyzzy | Msieve | 4 | 2015-11-14 13:59 |
Daylight Saving Time | davieddy | Lounge | 27 | 2015-02-26 18:45 |
Prime95 NOT Saving!!! | Primeinator | Information & Answers | 9 | 2008-09-22 19:00 |
Not Saving | BioRules | Information & Answers | 9 | 2008-05-31 13:52 |
Saving computation in ECM | dave_dm | Factoring | 8 | 2004-06-12 14:18 |