mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2022-04-10, 14:38   #2476
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

19×283 Posts
Default

They have a huge P-1 on https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...lo=1277&full=1

Last fiddled with by axn on 2022-04-10 at 14:45 Reason: Redundant
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-04-11, 07:09   #2477
tha
 
tha's Avatar
 
Dec 2002

85010 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axn View Post
For that exponent you would expect someone to use those bounds.
tha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-04-15, 07:29   #2478
S485122
 
S485122's Avatar
 
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

182310 Posts
Default Work Distribution Map

Quote:
Originally Posted by S485122 View Post
The Progress report shows one test result as being in error :
Code:
----------=-----=-- | -----=-----=-----=-----=----- | ...
  Exponent Range    | Composite  | Status Unproven  | ...
   Start   Count  P |   F    DC  |LL/PRP  ERR NO-LL | ...
----------=-----=-- | -----=-----=-----=-----=----- | ...
  10000000 61938    | 41350 20588           1       | ...
I think the exponent in question is 10496897. storm5510's PRP result is marked as suspect (which is why it shows in the ERR column I suppose.) Looking at the residue I suspect that result is good.
Anyway the Mersenne number has been LL tested and verified, PRP tested and verified, it has also been factored. Even if there are bad LL or PRP results it doesn't change the status of the exponent....
Bump !

More are factored now, but the 1 in the ERR column is still there while it shouldn't :
Code:
----------=-----=-- | -----=-----=-----=-----=----- | ...
  Exponent Range    | Composite  | Status Unproven  | ...
   Start   Count  P |   F    DC  |LL/PRP  ERR NO-LL | ...
----------=-----=-- | -----=-----=-----=-----=----- | ...
  10000000 61938    | 42085 19853           1       | ...
S485122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-04-24, 20:16   #2479
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

659410 Posts
Default Well that's odd

I think this is a server processing issue, not a prime95 issue.

727272727 had an assignment for LL first test by someone else in 2017, with zero progress.
Since no P-1 had been done, I tried to manually reserve it for P-1 factoring, which failed with error 40.
Today I updated a system to prime95 v30.8b14, and manually inserted into the first worker's worktodo section, on that updated system,
PFactor=1,2,727272727,-1,80,2
I figured upon PrimeNet interaction, it would get N/A inserted in the PFactor line, leave the existing LL assignment on the server as is, and all would be well. Nope.

Upon launch of the software, it synced with the server.
Its comm window shows the following:
Code:
[Main thread Apr 24 14:50] Mersenne number primality test program version 30.8
[Main thread Apr 24 14:50] Optimizing for CPU architecture: Xeon Phi, L2 cache size: 34x1 MB
[Main thread Apr 24 14:50] Starting workers.
[Comm thread Apr 24 14:50] Registering assignment: P-1 M727272727
[Comm thread Apr 24 14:50] Assignment registered as: (AID redacted)
[Comm thread Apr 24 14:50] Sending expected completion date for M727272727: Jun 12 2022
[Comm thread Apr 24 14:50] Done communicating with server.
prime.log says:
Code:
[Sun Apr 24 14:50:04 2022 - ver 30.8]
Registering assignment: P-1 M727272727
Assignment registered as: 77E9...
Sending expected completion date for M727272727: Jun 12 2022
https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...exp_hi=&full=1
now indicates I have an LL reservation since 2017 for it, updated today, and no P-1 assignment.
It's not wrong for a 5 year old LL reservation with 0.0% progress to get expired.

But sort of reassigned to the unwary and unwilling, a giant exponent LL, was quite unexpected.

The P-1 run time estimate is too long, but that is a separate issue.

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2022-04-24 at 20:53
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-06, 15:06   #2480
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

11001110000102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kriesel View Post
sort of reassigned to the unwary and unwilling, a giant exponent LL, was quite unexpected.
The P-1 completed and a no-factor result was reported to the server. The server shows an assignment of LL for me, since 2017, now at stage S2 92.5%, while the client installation has no PRP or LL entry in worktodo for 727272727, so the LL assignment is misplaced and orphaned, while the P-1 status is inconsistent on the server.
Reporting a P-1 unassigned result ought not mess with primality test or other pending assignments.
Easily enough fixed, somewhat, by unreserving it for LL myself.

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2022-05-06 at 15:12
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-07, 02:32   #2481
DrobinsonPE
 
Aug 2020

3·47 Posts
Default

I ran a P-1 on this number once but when I manually turned in the results.json.txt, it credited me twice. I am not sure how it happened. It was the last exponent of 10 that were all turned in at the same time.

https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...3851423&full=1
DrobinsonPE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-07, 02:39   #2482
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

3,733 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrobinsonPE View Post
I ran a P-1 on this number once but when I manually turned in the results.json.txt, it credited me twice.
The factor you found is a composite factor. The server split the factor and recorded the two prime factors separately, but it's an artifact of the exponent history that shows your original submitted result line (with the composite factor) twice rather than the two prime factors. It's not perfect, but it's working the way it's supposed to.
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-08, 01:56   #2483
DrobinsonPE
 
Aug 2020

8D16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
The factor you found is a composite factor. The server split the factor and recorded the two prime factors separately, but it's an artifact of the exponent history that shows your original submitted result line (with the composite factor) twice rather than the two prime factors. It's not perfect, but it's working the way it's supposed to.
Thank you, I think I knew that but forgot and did not realize it was a composite factor until after I asked the question. I will try not to ask another stupid question.
DrobinsonPE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-14, 16:52   #2484
ixfd64
Bemusing Prompter
 
ixfd64's Avatar
 
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California

2,467 Posts
Default

The "Recent Cleared" page is showing the following message:

Code:
Warning: Null value is eliminated by an aggregate or other SET operation.
Is this an issue?

Last fiddled with by ixfd64 on 2022-05-14 at 16:52
ixfd64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-14, 17:11   #2485
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

3,733 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ixfd64 View Post
Warning: Null value is eliminated by an aggregate or other SET operation.
I think it's probably related to a result submitted yesterday that George/Aaron are already investigating.
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-22, 11:44   #2486
S485122
 
S485122's Avatar
 
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

1,823 Posts
Default

Wouldn't it be a good thing to have a sticky post listing the known bugs and requests of the Mersenne server and site ?
Then if each one had a comment stating its status ("will be addressed in due time", "work in progress", "feature (live with it)", "will not be addressed", ...) there would be less duplicating of complaints, reports, ...
S485122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official "Faits erronés dans de belles-lettres" thread ewmayer Lounge 39 2015-05-19 01:08
Official "all-Greek-to-me Fiction Literature and Cinema" Thread ewmayer Science & Technology 41 2014-04-16 11:54
Official "Lasciate ogne speranza" whinge-thread cheesehead Soap Box 56 2013-06-29 01:42
Official "Ernst is a deceiving bully and George is a meanie" thread cheesehead Soap Box 61 2013-06-11 04:30
Official "String copy Statement Considered Harmful" thread Dubslow Programming 19 2012-05-31 17:49

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:28.


Mon Jul 4 22:28:44 UTC 2022 up 81 days, 20:30, 0 users, load averages: 1.08, 1.28, 1.26

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔