![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
2·7·11·61 Posts |
![]()
Hello,
I have a quick question regarding solving a weird log. Given the following: log (with base x-1) of x = f(x). Is it permissible to exponentiate in the following manner: (x-1)^y = (x-1)^(log base (x-1) of x) = (x-1)^y = x and then take the derivative y ln (x-1) = ln x 1/x-1 * y + y' * ln (x-1) = 1/x ... ect solving for y' is trivial. I know the alternate (which IS correct) is to rewrite using change of base yielding log x/ log x-1 = y and then taking the derivative. However, does the first method also arrive at the correct answer, or is it not legal? Any help is appreciated, Thanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
3×5×61 Posts |
![]()
I do not immediately see a problem by exponentiating in the fashion above- i.e. using (x-1) as a base to cancel the logarithm and then taking the log of both sides to bring down your dependent variable y looks sound. In addition, to my knowledge there is no problem with using change of base formula when the independent variable is in the base of the log. However, I am just an amateur on these forums. Perhaps someone with more expertise can speak on this subject?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
16238 Posts |
![]()
Using the change of base formula:
f(x) = log(x) / log(x-1) Via the quotient rule: f ' (x) =[ log(x-1) / x - log(x) / (x-1) ] / (log(x-1))^2 Using what you mention: f(x) = y = log(base x-1) of x (x-1)^y = (x-1)^(log base x-1 of x) yielding (x-1)^y = x Now taking the log of both sides: y log (x-1) = log (x) y = log (x) / log (x-1) If you differentiate this expression, you will end up with an identical result to the above method. Therefore, I will venture to guess that exponentiating in this fashion is perfectly fine (at least in this scenario). Whether it is true in all scenarios or not... is a question that I cannot answer. Last fiddled with by Primeinator on 2010-07-11 at 22:28 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts |
![]()
If y=u/v then yv = u
Differentiate both equations and solve for y'. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
194A16 Posts |
![]()
BTW what is x "independent" of?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Independent GPU factoring | siegert81 | Factoring | 1 | 2018-04-16 22:53 |
Modular Exponentiation results in PFGW | carpetpool | Information & Answers | 2 | 2017-11-03 07:24 |
Question on modular exponentiation? | ramshanker | Math | 2 | 2015-10-31 15:28 |
Variable FFT sizes | Mini-Geek | Software | 7 | 2008-01-14 17:33 |
optimum multiple exponentiation 'problem' | Greenbank | Math | 5 | 2005-09-30 10:20 |