![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Xebeche
Apr 2019
๐บ๐๐บ
5·89 Posts |
![]()
Hi, guys,
If you have a data set and you need to investigate it (see Title/Subj), then please don't hesitate to contact me. Perhaps I can suggest a better solution here. The quality of the fitting will be even better if you briefly comment on the nature of this dataset. And I will do it for you with great pleasure :) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
235078 Posts |
![]()
Go on then. Show them how it is done.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Xebeche
Apr 2019
๐บ๐๐บ
1101111012 Posts |
![]() Quote:
https://mersenneforum.org/showthread...071#post583071 If your question is how I guessed that it was such a model, then the shape of the curve reminded me of the rank distribution curve. I investigated these curves some time ago. I just guessed and experimented with a data set and the model a little. Last fiddled with by greenskull on 2021-10-06 at 20:12 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
5×2,011 Posts |
![]()
Where are the confidence intervals? Where is truth in advertising?
Don't bother answering though. These were rhetorical questions. I have no further questions to anyone who is not aware of the appropriate precision of presenting the data. Every time I see 15 digits of precision in slides, in presentation, aw well even in postings, - "I reach for my mental revolver." It shows immediately without any fear of contradiction the Dunning-Kruger effect in action. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Xebeche
Apr 2019
๐บ๐๐บ
44510 Posts |
![]() Quote:
And in support of my advise, I showed the correlation coefficients. You don't need to look at all the numbers, just look at five nines after zero and comma. It is enough. Last fiddled with by greenskull on 2021-10-06 at 20:26 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
7,649 Posts |
![]()
https://www.curveexpert.net/
Been using it for years and there have been many others. You can "roll your own" after a while. CERN had some interesting publicly available software that I was using in the mid 90's and I believe they still do, but I could be wrong. Analyzing particle physics data and reporting on the same is a professional grade art. Last fiddled with by jwaltos on 2021-10-07 at 02:02 |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Xebeche
Apr 2019
๐บ๐๐บ
5×89 Posts |
![]()
Yes, it's a useful tool.
But this software does not perform spectral analysis. And it does not allow, for example, to identify harmonic components within the process. And also it will not be possible to investigate complex Transient response. Much will have to be done manually. Last fiddled with by greenskull on 2021-10-07 at 09:25 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
Feb 2017
Nowhere
6,221 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Odd ms/inter and ETA info on one machine | irowiki | Software | 1 | 2018-09-25 13:38 |
Easier pi(x) approximation | mathPuzzles | Math | 8 | 2017-05-04 10:58 |
Inter-Search Time | davar55 | Forum Feedback | 9 | 2012-12-09 15:41 |
Fitting rectangle | ccorn | Puzzles | 27 | 2010-08-19 15:17 |
approximation of possible self-avoiding walks | ixfd64 | Math | 1 | 2007-11-26 05:57 |