![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Aug 2004
Melbourne, Australia
2308 Posts |
![]()
There seems to be a bit of a buzz about this "polymath" idea... basically, many people get together online and work together on a maths problem.
Here's a blog post: Is massively collaborative mathematics possible? The readers of this forum might be interested in the polymath: Finding primes. Thoughts? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston
1D5816 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
May 2003
7×13×17 Posts |
![]()
Dougy,
I think that this is a great idea. From what I understand, they found a new proof of Szemeredi's theorem under one polymath project. Last fiddled with by Zeta-Flux on 2009-10-08 at 16:05 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston
23·3·313 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
May 2003
7·13·17 Posts |
![]()
Dear Silverman,
Questions only need one question mark. ;) By "they" I meant the contributors to the polymath project headed by Gowers and Tao, which worked on Szemeredi's theorem. For more information see: http://michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/...itle=Polymath1 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston
23×3×313 Posts |
![]() Quote:
It is one thing when Fields Medalists collaborate. It is another thing when untrained people from this forum do so. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
May 2003
7×13×17 Posts |
![]()
And it is another when *both* groups collaborate; which is what this thread is about.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston
23·3·313 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I find the idea that Gowers and or Tao (or other similary trained people) would want to collaborate on research with people who don't even have an undergraduate math degree to be ludicrous. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
May 2003
60B16 Posts |
![]()
Silverman,
First, you seem to be missing an O at the end of your acronym. Second, did you even read the links that have been provided? This is getting tedious. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Aug 2004
Melbourne, Australia
9816 Posts |
![]()
I am quite surprised how much time these experts are spending putting this online and answering questions... I certainly wouldn't have time to do that. Although most of the responses I see here are quite reasonable (perhaps the questions are filtered anyway).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
May 2003
154710 Posts |
![]()
Yes, I believe the comments are filtered.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 5 | 2016-10-22 01:55 |
Aouessare-El Haddouchi-Essaaidi "test": "if Mp has no factor, it is prime!" | wildrabbitt | Miscellaneous Math | 11 | 2015-03-06 08:17 |
Possible extention to the "GPU to 72 Tool" project? | chalsall | GPU to 72 | 332 | 2012-01-04 01:45 |
Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier? | nitai1999 | Software | 7 | 2004-08-26 18:12 |