mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > New To GIMPS? Start Here! > Information & Answers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2021-06-01, 17:41   #23
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

2·11·443 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drkirkby View Post
You did not suggest I used sudo or su first!
Correct. Because not everyone "gets" my humor...

If someone actually /did/ do this it will only unlink their own data, and not damage the underlying instance. Unless, of course, they're already root...
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-01, 18:49   #24
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

3·13·251 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drkirkby View Post
Code:
UnreserveExponents=n
is documented in the fie undoc.txt. It is supposed to stop the server unassigning exponents if there are less than n of them per worker. I only added that a couple of weeks ago. It has not changed the behavior of the website
Set it to something like 100 or higher. Those of us doing small assignments often have it at 1000 or better. It is not to have the server unassign the exponent, rather for (m)Prime(95) to yield them up (if the server is told that, so be it.)
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-01, 20:33   #25
drkirkby
 
"David Kirkby"
Jan 2021
Althorne, Essex, UK

3·7·19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
Set it to something like 100 or higher. Those of us doing small assignments often have it at 1000 or better. It is not to have the server unassign the exponent, rather for (m)Prime(95) to yield them up (if the server is told that, so be it.)
Given undoc.txt says:
Code:
This file lists previously undocumented features available in the program.
These features may change or be discontinued at any time.  Their use is
totally unsupported.
I appreciate that it might not behave quite as expected. Perhaps you know something I don't. But from my reading of the undoc.txt
Code:
Normally, the program will unreserve an exponent if it is 
scheduled to start thirty days after the Test/Primenet Days of work to get 
value and there are more than four exponents queued up for the worker. 
You can adjust the days interval by setting in prime.txt:
        UnreserveDays=n         (default 30)
where n is the number of days.  You can also adjust the number of protected 
exponents in each worker with this setting in prime.txt:
         UnreserveExponents=m    (default 4)
 where m is the number of protected exponents. You should increase one or 
both of these values if you are loading up worktodo.txt with a large amount 
of work and do not want any of the work to be unreserved.
 WARNING: There have been several reports of a bug in prime95's calculations f
or UnreserveDays.  Thus, we recommend using UnreserveExponents to 
prevent unexpected unreserving of work,
making it 100 makes no sense for my interests - i.e. exponents around 103-104 million. Why would I want to protect 100 exponents? They would have expired by the time I get around to testing them - I don't have a supercomputer here.

Dave

Last fiddled with by drkirkby on 2021-06-01 at 20:36
drkirkby is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-01, 20:42   #26
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

2·11·443 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drkirkby View Post
...making it 100 makes no sense for my interests - i.e. exponents around 103-104 million.
Sigh...
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-01, 22:08   #27
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

3·13·251 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drkirkby View Post
making it 100 makes no sense for my interests - i.e. exponents around 103-104 million. Why would I want to protect 100 exponents? They would have expired by the time I get around to testing them - I don't have a supercomputer here.

Dave
Because you have been monkeying around with things, giving yourself extra breathing room with exponents and days will help prevent exponents dropped that you didn't mean to drop. You have been doing much beyond the set it and forget it realm. Putting both of those values at 100 or even 999 for days (for machines where your rolling average may have been reset) is common when you start twisting a lot of knobs and flipping switches.

And you don't need to sign every post. We can see your user name (and maybe an avatar).
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-01, 23:16   #28
PhilF
 
PhilF's Avatar
 
Feb 2005
Colorado

65310 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
Correct. Because not everyone "gets" my humor...

If someone actually /did/ do this it will only unlink their own data, and not damage the underlying instance. Unless, of course, they're already root...
Which I *always* am...
PhilF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-01, 23:57   #29
drkirkby
 
"David Kirkby"
Jan 2021
Althorne, Essex, UK

6178 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
Because you have been monkeying around with things, giving yourself extra breathing room with exponents and days will help prevent exponents dropped that you didn't mean to drop. You have been doing much beyond the set it and forget it realm. Putting both of those values at 100 or even 999 for days (for machines where your rolling average may have been reset) is common when you start twisting a lot of knobs and flipping switches.

And you don't need to sign every post. We can see your user name (and maybe an avatar).
Okay, I'll do as you suggest and set it to 100. The rolling average has actually crept up a small amount to 2452 from 2412. I will have to read and understand what that actually means.
drkirkby is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
i am new. How to manually test an exponent from 2^76 and up king Information & Answers 6 2018-02-08 14:28
Exponent fully factored whilst only 74% known mattmill30 Factoring 3 2016-08-14 18:09
What if you test an exponent on your own? LiquidNitrogen Information & Answers 2 2011-07-03 22:57
Is it possible to test an exponent > 79300000 ? Ding_Cong Software 4 2005-11-04 17:39
LL test of exponent in 41-42M range edorajh Lone Mersenne Hunters 2 2004-01-02 17:16

All times are UTC. The time now is 12:15.


Sun Jul 25 12:15:08 UTC 2021 up 2 days, 6:44, 0 users, load averages: 1.89, 1.78, 1.99

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.