mersenneforum.org Prime95 v30.4/30.5/30.6
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2021-05-07, 19:48   #287
drkirkby

"David Kirkby"
Jan 2021
Althorne, Essex, UK

40110 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ATH https://www.mersenne.org/report_pplus1/?f=1&all=1 Only 14 of the 24 current listed factors are real P+1 factors. The rest are old factors found again or combination of old factors found as composite or the same P+1 factors from days ago found for the 2nd time, because people are not using the known factors in the worktodo lines.

Is there a document that defines precisely the format of the worktodo.txt file used by mprime/Prime95? On the assignments page
there's a copy of the worktodo.txt file contents, in case ones file gets corrupted. But that is often slightly different to the contents in my worktodo.txt file, and I don't know what the differences are. The website shows ,3,1 on the end, but my worktodo.txt file does not have that.

Code:
PRP=xxxxx,1,2,108399059,-1,76,0   // in worktodo.txt
PRP=xxxxx,1,2,108399059,-1,76,0,3,1 // on website.
Is there a way of requesting a double-check of a P-1 factoring? If so, what does one put in the worktodo.txt file to try to get that assigned? Maybe there's no such work type anyway, but I was just interested if there was.

2021-05-07, 20:24   #288
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

26·32·17 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by drkirkby Is there a document that defines precisely the format of the worktodo.txt file used by mprime/Prime95?
Ken has compiled all of that here:
https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...8&postcount=22

2021-05-07, 20:58   #289
kriesel

"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

151316 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly Ken has compiled all of that here: https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...8&postcount=22

Also https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...36&postcount=2

As usual, use the reference info!

2021-05-07, 21:03   #290
drkirkby

"David Kirkby"
Jan 2021
Althorne, Essex, UK

40110 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly Ken has compiled all of that here: https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...8&postcount=22
Thank you

2021-05-07, 21:33   #291
drkirkby

"David Kirkby"
Jan 2021
Althorne, Essex, UK

401 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kriesel As usual, use the reference info!
You might want to consider changing the first sentence of that thread

It implies it is all about GPUs, but actually it has history, CPUs and many other things. But when I first saw a pointer to that, I did I not bother reading past the first sentence, as I assumed it's about GPUs, and only GPUs

Last fiddled with by drkirkby on 2021-05-07 at 21:35

 2021-05-12, 20:38 #292 ATH Einyen     Dec 2003 Denmark 7·11·41 Posts I have more RAM than I thought Attached Thumbnails
 2021-06-01, 00:38 #293 kriesel     "TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17" Mar 2017 US midwest 5·13·83 Posts Edge case Had been working on a motherboard with 32GB ram, prime95 allowed to use 12GB in P-1. Switched the hard drive with Windows 10 installed to a different motherboard with only 6GB installed, and launched prime95 without thinking about the memory limit. That's a very quickly pretty hung system, after launching prime95 that goes straight into a P-1 in progress; responds to ping, but that's about it. And the reset button. The following local.txt line does not work so well when there's only 6144MB physical ram installed: Memory=12288 during 7:30-23:30 else 12288 s/12288/4096/g; better. Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2021-06-01 at 00:41
 2021-06-07, 11:16 #294 Happy5214     "Alexander" Nov 2008 The Alamo City 32·7·11 Posts I've had two instances of mprime 30.6 (on different computers) delete the AutoBench=0 setting without permission and run benchmarks in the past couple of days. One is not connected to PrimeNet. Not sure what's going on.
 2021-06-07, 14:00 #295 ATH Einyen     Dec 2003 Denmark 7·11·41 Posts 30.6b4: Both mprime on an EC2 instance and Prime95 on my own computer did not generate and upload a proof for this PRP-CF test: 11109569 The PRP-CF just before that one on the same EC2 instance did generate proof: 11199701 and the last PRP-CF test I did on my own computer about 1 month ago also generated a proof: 11059453 https://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=26861 Last fiddled with by ATH on 2021-06-07 at 14:04
2021-06-07, 14:33   #296
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

979210 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ATH Both mprime on an EC2 instance and Prime95 on my own computer did not generate and upload a proof for this PRP-CF test: 11109569
I just started it on v30.5b2

2021-06-08, 07:00   #297
ATH
Einyen

Dec 2003
Denmark

C5516 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly I just started it on v30.5b2
Looks like your test did not generate a proof either. There might be a bug in the proof generation triggering on this exponent.

All times are UTC. The time now is 18:08.

Sun Jul 25 18:08:05 UTC 2021 up 2 days, 12:37, 0 users, load averages: 1.15, 1.50, 1.51