mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2011-08-21, 17:41   #1
jrk
 
jrk's Avatar
 
May 2008

21078 Posts
Default Team Sieve #28: c162 from 4788:2714

This factorization is now complete! c162=p58*p104!

line 2714 poly:

Code:
# sieve with ggnfs siever 14e on alg side from Q=20M to 110M
# aq4788:2714
n: 166628602458863199681412390571945956860829753847508222415516181474212983857492472997546584729232553557611656225147264335510630155874735267087971313501090504483283
# norm 1.033178e-15 alpha -7.397680 e 1.125e-12 rroots 5
skew: 8306870.08
c0:  1537653061177199519675438204046890885952
c1:  3935686831392450389288572372831416
c2: -1300482116441861083603358574
c3: -52381580831494617839
c4:  17170757066054
c5:  737880
Y0: -11769353184227158156714388973907
Y1:  971514928020629777
rlim: 45000000
alim: 45000000
lpbr: 29
lpba: 30
mfbr: 58
mfba: 60
rlambda: 2.5
alambda: 2.5
Reservations:
Code:
 20-  26 M  Andi47 (done)
 26-  90 M  debrouxl (done)
 90-  92 M  Mini-Geek (done, 1834879 relations)
 92-  95 M  jrk (done, 2723915 relations)
 95-112.5M  debrouxl (done)

Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2011-10-21 at 11:48 Reason: complete
jrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-04, 08:29   #2
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

977 Posts
Default

Given that jrk suggested sieving the C162 with 14e, after the current SNFS 242 factorization completes, I could queue on RSALS some WUs, preferably in a contiguous ranges of q values starting from the low q values.
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-07, 16:00   #3
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

2·17·73 Posts
Default

600 more ecm-curves @11e7, no factor.

reserving 20-26M for GNFS (and hoping for others to join).

Last fiddled with by schickel on 2011-10-08 at 04:19 Reason: Removing poly
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-08, 04:22   #4
schickel
 
schickel's Avatar
 
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville

2·1,061 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by debrouxl View Post
Given that jrk suggested sieving the C162 with 14e, after the current SNFS 242 factorization completes, I could queue on RSALS some WUs, preferably in a contiguous ranges of q values starting from the low q values.
Are you in a position to do this now? You could take a range starting at 26M.....

BTW, who's going to do the post on this?
schickel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-08, 07:26   #5
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

97710 Posts
Default

Yes, the sieving of "4099_67_minus1" is drawing to a close. At the time of this writing, the WU generation system is starving, so the clients will be starving in several hours unless I queue something.

Therefore, reserving 26M-90M

Local testing indicates ~1 relation per q value, at ~0.42 sec/rel on Core 2 (Duo) T7200.
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-08, 11:24   #6
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted
 
Mini-Geek's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

17·251 Posts
Default

Reserving 90M-92M.
Mini-Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-08, 13:21   #7
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

977 Posts
Default

Over the ~100 first results returned to RSALS, the yield is ~1.2 relation per q value.
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-08, 15:28   #8
jrk
 
jrk's Avatar
 
May 2008

44716 Posts
Default

Reserving 92M-95M
jrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-08, 19:18   #9
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT)

164016 Posts
Default

Assuming it will fit in 6 GB of memory and finish in less than a week on my Q6600 I would like to do postprocessing for a change.
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-10, 04:01   #10
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

3D116 Posts
Default

Yeah, filtering of 30-bit LPs tasks usually fits in 6 GB.
At the time of this writing, all WUs for the 26M-90M range have been created, and the WU stock will soon be depleted; results for 38.43M scattered q values have been returned, totaling 43459669 raw relations.
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-10, 05:54   #11
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

17218 Posts
Default

If nobody claims part of the remaining (95M-110M) range by tonight (CEST), i.e. in about twelve hours, I'll queue that range to RSALS, so that as far as RSALS is concerned, post-processing could start on Friday or Saturday
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Team sieve #36: c162 from 4788:i5141 jrk Aliquot Sequences 55 2013-02-07 01:39
Team sieve #23: c172 from 4788:i2617 schickel Aliquot Sequences 64 2011-02-19 02:28
Team sieve #21: c162 from 4788:2602 jrk Aliquot Sequences 31 2010-12-30 21:33
Team sieve #20: c170 from 4788:2549 schickel Aliquot Sequences 153 2010-11-09 07:39
Team sieve #5: c140 from 4788:2407 10metreh Aliquot Sequences 77 2009-05-27 20:39

All times are UTC. The time now is 06:43.

Wed Aug 12 06:43:49 UTC 2020 up 26 days, 2:30, 1 user, load averages: 1.36, 1.30, 1.42

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.