mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-06-06, 11:10   #34
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

2·33·43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kar_bon View Post
- 0 < n < 100000: all seqs < 10000 are included with current data from Factoring Database
You can get the status of 10000-100000 here. Note that
Code:
12012 1710. 2  C97 sz 97
is wrong: this was the old status of 10212, and 12012 was a typo that was never removed. Note also that 11280 has its old status from before when a typo was discovered in the earlier work.
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-06-06, 11:48   #35
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

46628 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10metreh View Post
You can get the status of 10000-100000 here. Note that
Code:
12012 1710. 2  C97 sz 97
is wrong: this was the old status of 10212, and 12012 was a typo that was never removed. Note also that 11280 has its old status from before when a typo was discovered in the earlier work.
Speaking of 10212 - I have picked up this one again and will do a few more iterations, but I don't plan to take it very far... (well... I might change my mind if it gets rid of that 2*3 driver.)
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-06-06, 14:46   #36
Greebley
 
Greebley's Avatar
 
May 2009
Dedham Massachusetts USA

15138 Posts
Default

Thanks for updating the list!

I did notice for some of the 10000 - 100000 range were not in the database. For example, 10344 only goes to 74 digits. Is this because someone else is doing the 10000 -100000 range? I was curious about what was the lowest sequence for which work done is NOT in the database, and 10344 appears to be the answer.
Greebley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-06-06, 15:14   #37
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

2·33·43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greebley View Post
For example, 10344 only goes to 74 digits. Is this because someone else is doing the 10000 -100000 range? I was curious about what was the lowest sequence for which work done is NOT in the database, and 10344 appears to be the answer.
It actually goes to 78 - the size of the initial composite is not the size of the remaining composite.

Clifford Stern maintains the 10000-100000 range, and he is constantly pushing the sequences in it higher. However, he has not put all that work into the database.
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-06-08, 15:29   #38
kar_bon
 
kar_bon's Avatar
 
Mar 2006
Germany

283810 Posts
Default

now all seqs for 10000 < n < 100000 are shown on the Summary pages, too.

but: the listed depths are mostly not in the database, yet.

same for n>250000.

so, i think, for a first milestone, all open (and some ended) seqs for n < 300000 are shown on those 3 pages!

next steps:
- check data with database
- insert more seqs in database
- stats/odds page
- try to 'hire' Clavier, Stern, Zimmermann, Bosma, Creyaufmueller and other contributors for this forum/database to share their results

suggestions?
kar_bon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-06-08, 20:44   #39
Greebley
 
Greebley's Avatar
 
May 2009
Dedham Massachusetts USA

34B16 Posts
Default

Not sure if this is useful, but it is a list of the numbers that reach 1 quadrillion(10^15) before the merge with an earlier sequence or terminate.

The list is of the form:
<number> | <maximum> | <merged or maxed>

The maximum is pretty low. I used 8 byte numbers with trial division up to 2^26 from a program I wrote before finding this group. However, since 1 quadrillion is less than the square of 2^26, all sequence reached 1 quadrillion. In fact they only stopped when going over 2^64, or some factor was greater than the max prime squared and no prime divided it.

I included this because it has the 3740 numbers that might be significant and includes ones that may have been weeded out because they merged at some point after 1 quadrillion. I don't know if you want to put these numbers into the list, or whether you already have this info, but I figured it wouldn't hurt to mention it.

Out of the 3740, 113 merged with a previous sequences given the limits above.

I also have a list of:

Those that reached 1 trillion, but not 1 quadrillion. (340 numbers)
Those that reached 1 billion, but not 1 trillion. (662 numbers)
Attached Files
File Type: txt quadrillion.txt (132.6 KB, 146 views)
Greebley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-06-08, 20:45   #40
Greebley
 
Greebley's Avatar
 
May 2009
Dedham Massachusetts USA

3·281 Posts
Default

Here is the numbers that reach 1 trillion but not 1 quadrillion.
Attached Files
File Type: txt trillion.txt (10.8 KB, 118 views)
Greebley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-06-08, 20:46   #41
Greebley
 
Greebley's Avatar
 
May 2009
Dedham Massachusetts USA

34B16 Posts
Default

and the one that reach 1 billion but not 1 trillion.
Attached Files
File Type: txt billion.txt (19.1 KB, 232 views)
Greebley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-07-04, 07:32   #42
kar_bon
 
kar_bon's Avatar
 
Mar 2006
Germany

1011000101102 Posts
Exclamation Help needed!

i'm trying to complete the page for 100k<n<200k sequences.
but there're a lot of them not yet filled with the whole seq in the database from Syd.

so, please, anyone can help here!

to do:
- go to the summary page here
- (by now all seqs upto 122k are filled in) click on a seq-number
- compare the given parameters from the summary page with the database

- if the database-index is smaller, do:
- download a seq-file from Franks page here
- convert the *.ALQ file into a textbased *.ELF file with ALQ2ELF.EXE
- upload from missing index to the database
- sometimes the database needs a TF to 10^7 to bring the composite cofactor like in the summary noted!

i will try to fill in more, but it's very timeconsuming (got all those elf) to upload them.

if a file is in the database, i need only seconds to verify against the summary page.

after all seqs are in the database and the summary is checked, i could include some stat there, too:

max/min/mean number of indices/sizes/composites so everyone can see the progress in this range!
kar_bon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-07-04, 11:06   #43
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

2×33×43 Posts
Default

Karsten, 157752 is reserved by D. Stevens (aka henryzz). You seem to have missed it out.
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-07-04, 12:20   #44
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted
 
Mini-Geek's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

17×251 Posts
Default

Let's do some reservations to help make the work filling in the DB a bit more orderly:
Reserving 122540-130k (122540 is the first after Karsten's indicator on the page)
Now if anybody wants to help work on it while I'm still not up to 130k, you can just start at 130k.
Edit: Do we need to do anything when the DB has a newer status than your page? e.g. 123450

Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2009-07-04 at 12:26
Mini-Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Broken aliquot sequences fivemack FactorDB 45 2020-05-16 15:22
Finessing the Aliquot reservation page to sequences above 1 million yoyo Aliquot Sequences 69 2020-02-06 22:12
poaching aliquot sequences... Andi47 FactorDB 21 2011-12-29 21:11
User summary page: CPU results last 24 hours thureduehrsen PrimeNet 2 2011-04-01 12:42
New article on aliquot sequences schickel mersennewiki 0 2008-12-30 07:07

All times are UTC. The time now is 21:29.

Mon Aug 3 21:29:43 UTC 2020 up 17 days, 17:16, 0 users, load averages: 1.43, 1.45, 1.41

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.