mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2022-10-01, 16:36   #892
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

10011111101102 Posts
Default

Thanks for the post, Jean-Luc. I'll still hold off adding them to this thread for now.
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-01, 20:33   #893
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

2·5·7·73 Posts
Default

I think I've been successful with my script conversion to use the .elf files, however, as a result I have lost some things, such as the identification of cycles. These will be shown as opens in my scripts, so we'll have to be on the lookout and manually try to keep track of them. Perhaps cycles should be annotated in the n^i thread primarily. Fortunately, they are rare.

My time comparison appears to be only a little slower, but since the db doesn't seem to register any activity, it is well worth the extra time. I will be looking into using the .elfs from now on wherever I can in my scripts.

I have updated post #1 using the new script, but there isn't too much info now (unless that's due to failure of the new script).
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-01, 20:39   #894
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

23×5×172 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdH View Post
Actually, thinking more about this, Jean-Luc had it reserved by base in the main project and sub-let it to the index 1 effort for that index only. The termination was consequential, so I'm actually thinking we should credit him for any such terminations.

For now, I'm not including 888, 996 or 1264460 in this thread because they haven't been released by Jean-Luc for anything but index 1 work.

I'm currently looking at rewrites for my scipts, so it may be a bit before I update post #1.
All sounds good. Yes, Jean-Luc gets credit for the termination of 996^58.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdH View Post
I haven't been running base 233 in my scripts since it was claimed as reserved, so it won't show up unless I add it manually. I'll add 888, 996 and 1264460 to this thread (even though they don't have tables yet) and credit you with the termination, since you did have it reserved by post. I have the update scripts running right now. This thread's updating takes more work than the index 1 thread, which is now only a couple steps.
That makes sense. Since it's reserved in the main thread and Suika terminated it there, Jean-Luc should pick up the credit for termination from there when doing his updates.

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2022-10-01 at 20:49
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-01, 20:48   #895
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

23·5·172 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garambois View Post
Thank you, it's safer that way.
But if you absolutely insist on already working on these bases, please don't touch the following exponents :
Base 888, even exponents <48, odd exponents <35.
Base 996, even exponents <50, odd exponents <33.
Base 1264460, even exponents <24, odd exponents <17.
No worries for the upper exponents, I didn't do any work on them.

I've been careful to only add a single iteration when working on these in the index 1 thread. Of course the DB workers might add 1-2 more. Everything else when there is a same-parity sequence that I/Ed added 1 iteration to, I take it to it's logical conclusion. That could mean adding just the one or several iterations or even termination.

When new bases are officially added to the page with no reservation, that is when I'll do my typical initialization stuff on all exponents that have had little to no work done on them.

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2022-10-01 at 20:48
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-01, 21:06   #896
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France

13·79 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
All sounds good. Yes, Jean-Luc gets credit for the termination of 996^58.

That makes sense. Since it's reserved in the main thread and Suika terminated it there, Jean-Luc should pick up the credit for termination from there when doing his updates.
No, no, I did not calculate these sequences.
I have only done work on these bases for the exponents specified above !
garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-01, 21:43   #897
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

264508 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garambois View Post
No, no, I did not calculate these sequences.
I have only done work on these bases for the exponents specified above !
The reason why we would prefer to give you credit for 996^58 is because when Ed factored it on index 1, it primed on the next index. We put no extra effort into it. These were preliminary bases that you lent to us for one index. But of course it's ultimately up to you how you credit it.
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-01, 21:57   #898
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

101101001010002 Posts
Default

48^96 terminates

Only 1 remains on base 48 now!

#10 from the index 1 effort.

Ed, the C135 group you did at index 1 yesterday was a nice group. These last two terminations including 696^56 were from that group.
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-02, 01:09   #899
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

264508 Posts
Default

210^66 terminates

A good couple of days for Index 1 splits.
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-04, 22:07   #900
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

23·5·172 Posts
Default

137^89 terminates

Our first prime base termination from the index 1 effort, #12 overall.
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-05, 12:42   #901
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

23×5×172 Posts
Default

353^51, 53, 55, 57, 59, & 61 terminate

359^51, 53, 55, 57, & 61 terminate

359^59 was terminated by Anonymous.

The only one that I'm still working on for these two new bases is 359^65.

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2022-10-05 at 13:13 Reason: 353^65 -> 359^65
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-05, 15:17   #902
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

2×5×7×73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
48^96 terminates

Only 1 remains on base 48 now!

#10 from the index 1 effort.

Ed, the C135 group you did at index 1 yesterday was a nice group. These last two terminations including 696^56 were from that group.
I show 48^94 and 48^100 remaining open.
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unexpected termination of PM-1 Miszka Software 22 2021-11-19 21:36
Easier pi(x) approximation mathPuzzles Math 8 2017-05-04 10:58
Would finding a definate Pi value easier if... xtreme2k Math 34 2013-09-09 23:54
Aliquot Termination Question - Largest Prime? EdH Aliquot Sequences 6 2010-04-06 00:12
A new termination below 100k 10metreh Aliquot Sequences 0 2010-03-11 18:24

All times are UTC. The time now is 04:10.


Tue Dec 6 04:10:59 UTC 2022 up 110 days, 1:39, 0 users, load averages: 1.70, 1.60, 1.27

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔